bug#49217: [PATCH] tests: exercise shuf --input-range edge cases

2021-06-26 Thread Erik Auerswald
* tests/misc/shuf.sh: Test valid "shuf -i" edge cases that result in a single line of input, or no line at all. Test an invalid range, too. --- tests/misc/shuf.sh | 11 ++- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tests/misc/shuf.sh b/tests/misc/shuf.sh index 892386b3

bug#49217: [PATCH] doc: clarify valid ranges for shuf -i

2021-06-26 Thread Erik Auerswald
* doc/coreutils.texi (shut invocation): Mention valid and invalid edge cases for --input-range. --- doc/coreutils.texi | 5 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/coreutils.texi b/doc/coreutils.texi index ea040458e..f59c5e962 100644 --- a/doc/coreutils.texi +++ b/do

bug#49217: 'shuf' returns nothing if the low range number is higher by 1 than the high number

2021-06-25 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi Paul, On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 09:29:04AM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote: > On 6/24/21 11:49 PM, Erik Auerswald wrote: > > $ shuf -i 2-0 ; echo %exit code $? > > shuf: invalid input range: ‘2-0’ > > %exit code 1 > > $ shuf -i 1-0 ; echo %exit code $? >

bug#49217: 'shuf' returns nothing if the low range number is higher by 1 than the high number

2021-06-25 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 08:54:43AM +0200, Erik Auerswald wrote: > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 08:49:51AM +0200, Erik Auerswald wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 09:19:36PM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote: > > > On 6/24/21 4:46 PM, F8ER F8ER wrote: > > > >For example,

bug#49217: [PATCH] shuf: fix bug with "-i 1-0"

2021-06-25 Thread Erik Auerswald
"shuf -i 1-0" would mistakenly accept the invalid range without an error message and produce no output. Other invalid ranges, e.g., "shuf -i 2-0", would be detected and produce an error message, non-zero exit code, and no output. Bug reported by "F8ER F8ER." * src/shuf.c (main): Fix bug. * tests

bug#49217: 'shuf' returns nothing if the low range number is higher by 1 than the high number

2021-06-24 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 08:49:51AM +0200, Erik Auerswald wrote: > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 09:19:36PM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote: > > On 6/24/21 4:46 PM, F8ER F8ER wrote: > > >For example, `shuf -i 101-100 -n 1` returns nothing with the exit code > > >= 0 (unexpecte

bug#49217: 'shuf' returns nothing if the low range number is higher by 1 than the high number

2021-06-24 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 09:19:36PM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote: > On 6/24/21 4:46 PM, F8ER F8ER wrote: > >For example, `shuf -i 101-100 -n 1` returns nothing with the exit code > >= 0 (unexpected). > > Actually, it's the expected behavior. It's the same behavior as > 'shuf -n 1 exactly 1 line";

bug#47859: Additional seq outlandish example: seq 0 dangers

2021-04-17 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 09:26:28AM +0800, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote: > On (info "(coreutils) seq invocation") we read >Be careful when using ‘seq’ with outlandish values: otherwise you >may... > > Here's another 'fun/sad/DDOS yourself' example you might add: > > One day I wrote a Makefi

bug#47246: pr -f does not pause

2021-03-18 Thread Erik Auerswald
POSIX specifies that pr -f shall "[p]ause before beginning the first page if the standard output is associated with a terminal" (see https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/pr.html). GNU pr does not do this. [The recently reported bug#47243 (https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bu

bug#47085: du: why does 'usage' show prefixes 'Z' or 'Y' if they are disallowed?

2021-03-11 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 08:53:03PM -0800, L A Walsh wrote: > I thought to display 0 (or 0) for 1st arg by doing: > > du -BY, as -B says I can list a unit for scaling, but for > -BY and -BZ I get: > du: -B argument 'Y' too large. > > It doesn't even look to see how much space is used, it > im

bug#45358: bootstrap fails due to a certificate mismatch

2021-03-09 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 11:28:18AM +0200, Grigoriy Sokolik wrote: > I've rechecked: I cannot reproduce the problem, the certificate is trusted by my system: # via IPv4 $ gnutls-cli --verbose translationproject.org [...]issuer `CN=DST Root CA X3,O=Digital Signature Trust Co.'[...

bug#46422: [PATCH] Re: bug#46422: 'pr' screws up tabstops in multicolumn outpt?

2021-02-14 Thread Erik Auerswald
On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 11:04:21PM +, Pádraig Brady wrote: > On 14/02/2021 19:22, Erik Auerswald wrote: > >May I ask you to test the new patch (v4) as well? > > This version looks good. > I'll probably apply this after a little more local testing. Thanks!

bug#46422: [PATCH] Re: bug#46422: 'pr' screws up tabstops in multicolumn outpt?

2021-02-14 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On 13.02.21 21:28, Leonard Janis Robert König wrote: On Sat, 2021-02-13 at 21:15 +0100, Erik Auerswald wrote: On 13.02.21 19:29, Leonard Janis Robert König wrote: [...] That being said, I don't see this exact distinction reflected in the code, so perhaps I just misunderstood. Disa

bug#46422: [PATCH] Re: bug#46422: 'pr' screws up tabstops in multicolumn outpt?

2021-02-13 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On 13.02.21 19:29, Leonard Janis Robert König wrote: first: Thank you very much for the work, I really owe you one! You're welcome. :-) On Sat, 2021-02-13 at 17:58 +0100, Erik Auerswald wrote: On 13.02.21 15:17, Erik Auerswald wrote: On 11.02.21 20:20, Erik Auerswald wrote: O

bug#46422: [PATCH] Re: bug#46422: 'pr' screws up tabstops in multicolumn outpt?

2021-02-13 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On 13.02.21 15:17, Erik Auerswald wrote: On 11.02.21 20:20, Erik Auerswald wrote: On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 06:09:28PM +0100, Leonard Janis Robert König wrote: On Thu, 2021-02-11 at 16:45 +0100, Erik Auerswald wrote: On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 04:12:54PM +0100, Leonard Janis Robert König

bug#46422: [PATCH] Re: bug#46422: 'pr' screws up tabstops in multicolumn outpt?

2021-02-13 Thread Erik Auerswald
On 11.02.21 20:20, Erik Auerswald wrote: On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 06:09:28PM +0100, Leonard Janis Robert König wrote: On Thu, 2021-02-11 at 16:45 +0100, Erik Auerswald wrote: On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 04:12:54PM +0100, Leonard Janis Robert König wrote: On Thu, 2021-02-11 at 13:00 +0100, Erik

bug#46422: 'pr' screws up tabstops in multicolumn outpt?

2021-02-11 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 06:09:28PM +0100, Leonard Janis Robert König wrote: > On Thu, 2021-02-11 at 16:45 +0100, Erik Auerswald wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 04:12:54PM +0100, Leonard Janis Robert > > König wrote: > > > On Thu, 2021-02-11 at 13:00 +0100, Erik Aue

bug#46422: 'pr' screws up tabstops in multicolumn outpt?

2021-02-11 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 01:42:29PM +0100, Leonard Janis Robert König wrote: > I'm sorry if I this is not a bug but to be expected, but I thnk pr > doesn't get the alignment of tabs in multicolumn output right. > [...] > This seems *kind* of related to multi-column merged output, as was > discu

bug#46422: 'pr' screws up tabstops in multicolumn outpt?

2021-02-10 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 01:42:29PM +0100, Leonard Janis Robert König wrote: > I'm sorry if I this is not a bug but to be expected, but I thnk pr > doesn't get the alignment of tabs in multicolumn output right. > [...] > Unfortunately the POSIX spec is, in my reading, a bit unclear here. I do

bug#46422: 'pr' screws up tabstops in multicolumn outpt?

2021-02-10 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 01:42:29PM +0100, Leonard Janis Robert König wrote: > I'm sorry if I this is not a bug but to be expected, but I thnk pr > doesn't get the alignment of tabs in multicolumn output right. > > Consider the following test input, where everything from x->x is a tab > (with

bug#46060: Offer ls --limit=...

2021-01-24 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi Dan, On 23.01.21 22:13, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote: I hereby propose "ls --limit=..." $ ls --limit=1 # Would only print one result item: A You might say: "Jacobson, just use "ls|sed q". Closed: Worksforme." Ah, but I am talking about items, not lines: You can use the ls option '-1' to print

bug#44444: RFE for 'env'?

2020-11-06 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 11:41:44AM -0800, L A Walsh wrote: > On 2020/11/04 08:09, Erik Auerswald wrote: > >Please see > >https://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/manual/html_node/env-invocation.html#g_t_002dS_002f_002d_002dsplit_002dstring-usage-in-scripts > >for an expl

bug#44444: RFE for 'env'?

2020-11-04 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 07:27:17AM -0800, L A Walsh wrote: > Rewriting this bug as the other one, apparently, was too unclear > to be understood. > > This gives an example, two in fact. > > > On 2020/11/03 14:48, Bernhard Voelker wrote: > >On 11/3/20 6:29 PM, L A Walsh wrote: > >>I trie

bug#37702: Suggestion for 'df' utility

2020-05-31 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi John, On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 06:52:04PM +1000, John Pye wrote: > The purpose of "df" is to show "disk free". Hence any filesystems that > are read-only or which are FUSE-mounted one on of the local physical > filesystems, or similar things (what others?) should be suppressed by > default. The

bug#37702: Suggestion for 'df' utility

2020-05-30 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi all, On 30.05.20 05:18, Bryce Harrington wrote: On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 12:56:20PM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote: On 10/11/19 11:20 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote: if you want to exclude nested file systems like that, you could try:   alias df='df -x squashfs' On my Fedora 30 workstation that opt

bug#41563: Possible bug with 'sort -Vr' version sorting

2020-05-28 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 01:01:05PM +0200, Kamil Dudka wrote: > On Thursday, May 28, 2020 11:02:43 AM CEST Erik Auerswald wrote: > > On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 08:48:16AM +0200, Kamil Dudka wrote: > > > It is the underscore in the .x86_64 suffix what breaks the version compa

bug#41563: Possible bug with 'sort -Vr' version sorting

2020-05-28 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 08:48:16AM +0200, Kamil Dudka wrote: > On Wednesday, May 27, 2020 2:07:32 PM CEST Danie de Jager via GNU coreutils > Bug Reports wrote: > > > > I use sort -Vr to sort version numbers. I noticed this discrepancy on > > the latest kernel version from Centos 7.8. > > >

bug#41563: Possible bug with 'sort -Vr' version sorting

2020-05-27 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 02:07:32PM +0200, Danie de Jager via GNU coreutils Bug Reports wrote: > I use sort -Vr to sort version numbers. I noticed this discrepancy on > the latest kernel version from Centos 7.8. > > command to get output: > # ls -t /boot/vmlinuz-* | sed "s/\/boot\/vmlinuz-//g

bug#38299: A bug while trying to decode a non encode base64

2019-11-21 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 12:04:11PM +0530, vardhaman narasagoudar wrote: > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 12:51 AM Paul Eggert wrote: > > On 11/20/19 6:22 AM, Martin Schulte wrote: > > > vardhamanbn1 is a valid encoding > > > > Thanks for explaining; closing the bug report. > > Thanks for replying t

bug#37062: Changes set are no applied to a locally plugged external device

2019-08-19 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi Ricky, On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 01:23:31PM +0300, Ricky Tigg wrote: > Component under* Linux Fedora*: coreutils.x86_64 8.31-2.fc30 @updates > > Changes set are no applied to a locally plugged external device Perhaps the external device's filesystem does not support Unix access controls. Per

bug#36831: enhance 'directory not empty' message

2019-08-01 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 04:05:05PM -0600, Assaf Gordon wrote: > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 06:50:46PM -0500, Paul Eggert wrote: > > On 7/29/19 1:28 AM, Assaf Gordon wrote: > > > + if (rename_errno == ENOTEMPTY || rename_errno == EEXIST) > > > +{ > > > + error (0, 0, _("canno

bug#35032: date ISO 8601 / RFC 3339 formats

2019-03-28 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 10:43:42AM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote: > On 3/28/19 10:20 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > Would it be possible to make them both optional in --rfc-3339, and > > both mandatory in --iso-8601 ? > > Sorry, I don't understand what you're proposing, specifically. Can you > say

bug#34700: rm refuses to remove files owned by the user, even in force mode

2019-03-03 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On 3/3/19 09:40, L A Walsh wrote: On 3/2/2019 11:31 AM, Bob Proulx wrote: But regardless of that it does not change the fact that the entire purpose of read-only directories is to prevent removing and renaming of files within them. But not by the user owning them. The ratio

bug#34700: rm refuses to remove files owned by the user, even in force mode

2019-03-02 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On 3/2/19 07:18, Bob Proulx wrote: Nicolas Mailhot wrote: For their own reasons, the Go maintainers have decided the user Go cache will now be read-only. https://github.com/golang/go/issues/27161#issuecomment-433098406 That means cleaning up cache artefacts with rm does not work anymore htt

bug#33371: RFC: option for numeric sort: ignore-non-numeric characters

2018-11-14 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 06:32:55PM -0800, L A Walsh wrote: > I have a bunch of files numbered from 1-over 2000 without leading zeros > (think rfc's)... > They have names with a non-numeric prefix & suffix around the number. Are prefix and suffix constant? RFC files are usually named rfc${NR}.

bug#32127: RFE -- in the way "cp -rl" -- enable 'ln' to do likewise?

2018-07-18 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 04:36:44AM -0600, Mike Hodson wrote: > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 4:24 AM L A Walsh wrote: > > > In the case of creating a link to a directory there is > > no choice in creating a "working solution". If you want a link > > there, it HAS to be a symlink. That the user w

bug#32127: RFE -- in the way "cp -rl" -- enable 'ln' to do likewise?

2018-07-17 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 11:14:21PM +0200, Bernhard Voelker wrote: > On 07/14/2018 07:51 PM, L A Walsh wrote: > > Paul Eggert wrote: > >> On 07/12/2018 02:16 AM, L A Walsh wrote: > >>> I'm asking why does 'ln' bother to tell the user that they are > >>> wrong and do nothing useful? Why not

bug#31184: tail -f on Network FS not refreshing as soon as the file is changed.

2018-04-17 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi Jewsco, did you already try the -F option instead of -f? Thanks, Erik On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 03:46:27PM +, Jewsco Pius Jacquez wrote: > Padraig, thanks for your response, > > The ---disable-inotify didn't refresh either. > > [root@cmilsbtest03 ~]# stat -f -c '%t %T' /media/samba/test.

bug#24813: Du Maximum files?

2016-10-28 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi Ben, On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 05:56:07AM +, Benny D. Miller Jr. wrote: > I am not so sure that this is a bug but a limitation. I am using > "du" for a disk file listing/usage in the command: > > du --all --time --human-readable --apparent-size $1; You did not specify any problems with the

bug#24561: Unmathematical bc exponentiation behavior

2016-09-28 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi Tobias, On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 03:48:27PM +, Martens, Tobias wrote: > echo "-(1)^2" | bc > 1 > > I would have expected -1. This behavior is unmathematical and very > confusing, because otherwise bc acts quite logic. bc did exactly what you asked it to do. You probably meant to write:

bug#23773: su is not working for non-root users

2016-06-16 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 07:44:06AM +0200, Bernhard Voelker wrote: > On 06/15/2016 06:31 PM, Al Mamun wrote: > > I was trying to "su - nonrootuser" but it returns incorrect password but > > the password is ok and I can login from ssh. Everything is good with root. > > Only the non-root user is

bug#22511: [request] Add "--preserve-setuid" to the chown command

2016-02-01 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 03:33:29AM +0100, William Di Luigi wrote: > if I understand it correctly, chown clears the setuid bit for security > reasons (since, when changing the owner or group for a file, you could > potentially be allowing *new people* to run that file as root). > > While this

bug#22001: Is it possible to tab separate concatenated files?

2015-11-27 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 08:28:13PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote: > On 11/26/2015 04:52 PM, Linda Walsh wrote: > > >> Because every plain > >> text line in a file must be terminated with a newline. > > > >That's only a recent POSIX definition. It's not related to > > real life. When I lo

bug#21349: who shows no users nowadays on Debian

2015-08-27 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 02:13:37PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote: > Erik Auerswald wrote: > > This works on a current Debian/testing system (stable as well), so it might > > be a recent Debian/Sid (unstable) issue. Perhaps you want to open a bug > > report there? > > Upd

bug#21349: who shows no users nowadays on Debian

2015-08-26 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi Dan, On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 07:14:41AM +0800, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote: > (info "(coreutils) who invocation") says > > If given no non-option arguments, ‘who’ prints the following > information for each user currently logged on: login name, terminal > line, login time, and remote hostname or X

bug#21325: ls : feature request --width=zero

2015-08-23 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 04:35:06AM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote: > Erik Auerswald wrote: > >an explicit "Inf" keyword is still better than some number that > >relies on system limits > > With the latest patch, there are no system limits; you can use as > big a

bug#21325: ls : feature request --width=zero

2015-08-23 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 08:58:01PM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote: > Pádraig Brady wrote: > >Also base64 -w0 has similar meaning. > > I didn't know that, but I don't like that either. Utilities should > use an explicit representation for infinity, if that's what they > need. 'Inf', say. > > In t

bug#20936: suggestion for a 'wart-ish' extension off of 'sort'

2015-06-30 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 02:35:17AM -0700, Linda Walsh wrote: > > On 6/30/2015 12:46 AM, Erik Auerswald wrote: > > > >>>du -sh *|sort -h|tail > >Why not use 'du -shc * | sort -h | tail -n11'? > >The total produced by du will sort after all the

bug#20936: suggestion for a 'wart-ish' extension off of 'sort'

2015-06-30 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 12:28:09AM -0700, Linda Walsh wrote: > I admit the ability to show a summary line might not bethe first > thing you'd think a pure-sorting utility might do, but it would be > awfully handy if sort had a 'Numeric sum' option ("-N" -- preferred > '-s', but it's already ta

bug#20745: I would like to make a request for the sort command

2015-06-08 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 10:51:59AM +0100, Stephane Chazelas wrote: > 2015-06-08 11:16:37 +0200, Erik Auerswald: > [...] > > FWIW I use 'sort' to sort IPv4 addresses in my ping_scan[1] script. > > > > The info documentation for sort provides another example,

bug#20745: I would like to make a request for the sort command

2015-06-08 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 01:57:33PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > On 06/05/2015 01:35 PM, Silverman, Jeffrey X. -ND wrote: > > >> This was previously discussed, and while has merit > >> at the time it was thought not important enough to add: > >> > >> http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/reject

bug#20553: 'echo -e' does not escape backslash correctly

2015-05-12 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 11:17:34PM +0100, Stephane Chazelas wrote: > 2015-05-11 23:50:25 +0200, Jo Drexl (FFGR-IT): > > Hi guys, > > I had to write a Windows bat file for twentysomething users and - as > > Linux geek - wrote a small Bash script for it. The code in question is > > as follows: >

bug#20474: tr command

2015-05-01 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 11:10:52AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > On 04/30/2015 10:31 AM, Joseph Piette wrote: > > When transferring files from the Windows environment to the Linux > > environment we execute a script to remove the \cr characters. The script > > performs a simple > > > > tr -d '

bug#20354: [feature request] ln with command line arguments in reverse order

2015-04-17 Thread Erik Auerswald
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 03:07:50PM +0200, Bernhard Voelker wrote: > On 04/17/2015 02:45 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote: > > ln [OPTIONS] EXISTING NEW > > I stilll think this is a translation issue. > And I don't think the synopsis has to look the same as for > cp and mv. If you really want it to be ch

bug#20354: [feature request] ln with command line arguments in reverse order

2015-04-17 Thread Erik Auerswald
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 01:45:02PM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote: > On 17/04/15 12:45, Erik Auerswald wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 01:12:01PM +0200, Bernhard Voelker wrote: > >> On 04/17/2015 10:39 AM, Ma Jiehong wrote: > >>> Currently, 'cp', 'mv&#

bug#20354: [feature request] ln with command line arguments in reverse order

2015-04-17 Thread Erik Auerswald
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 01:12:01PM +0200, Bernhard Voelker wrote: > On 04/17/2015 10:39 AM, Ma Jiehong wrote: > >Currently, 'cp', 'mv' and 'ln' share the same basic syntax, that is to say > >the following: > > > >cp [OPTION] SOURCE DEST > >mv [OPTION] SOURCE DEST > >ln [OPTIONS] TARGET LINK_NAME

bug#19243: echo comand bug

2014-12-02 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 11:12:51AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote: > On 12/01/2014 10:56 AM, Chema F. Ledesma wrote: > > > > If you execute echo "" it does something strange > > repeating the last command before echo comand. > > Thanks for the report. However, this is not a

bug#15945: chown: Does now allow setting user and users login group with numerical user ID

2013-11-21 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 08:53:47AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote: > On 11/21/2013 04:50 AM, Tormen wrote: > > > > I think I just found a bug in chown... \o/ ;) > > > > I tried: > > chown 1001: /tmp/bla > > > > Leading to: > > chown: invalid spec: `1001:' > > Drop the trailing colon. > >

bug#15092: Dirname Bug

2013-08-14 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hello Axel, On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 09:16:14AM +0200, Axel Spallek wrote: > the following throw errors: > > dirname --to-0040257282759-in.wav > dirname "--to-0040257282759-in.wav" > dirname '--to-0040257282759-in.wav' > > IMHO at least the last two ones schould work. If the arguments to a program

bug#13394: Misalignment for "seq -w"

2013-01-09 Thread Erik Auerswald
On 01/09/2013 01:05 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote: On 01/09/2013 11:01 AM, Erik Auerswald wrote: Hi, On 01/09/2013 11:34 AM, Bernhard Voelker wrote: On 01/09/2013 11:14 AM, Marcel Böhme wrote: There are the following problems with the -w parameter of the seq tool: [...] Hmm, according to the

bug#13394: Misalignment for "seq -w"

2013-01-09 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On 01/09/2013 11:34 AM, Bernhard Voelker wrote: On 01/09/2013 11:14 AM, Marcel Böhme wrote: There are the following problems with the -w parameter of the seq tool: [...] Hmm, according to the TEXI manual, the FIRST number should also use a fixed point decimal representation when the -w o

bug#13391: dd silently ignores lseek error

2013-01-08 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 01:14:22AM +, Pádraig Brady wrote: > On 01/08/2013 08:55 PM, Paul Eggert wrote: >> On 01/08/13 10:11, Neil Klopfenstein wrote: >>> Note that it begins reading at the _beginning of the ar file_ -- the 'skip' >>> argument has failed silently. >> >> But the 'skip' hasn

bug#13295: Possible bug - tr utility

2012-12-28 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi Randy, On 12/28/2012 06:37 PM, Killen, Randy wrote: Hello - I encountered the situation shown below so thought that I would report it to see if it might be a bug or is expected behavior. Please let me know if you need additional information. Randy $ $ echo something | tr [:lower:] [:up

bug#12301: tail -F & ZFS

2012-08-29 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 11:33:13AM +0200, Bernhard Voelker wrote: > On 08/29/2012 11:12 AM, Jim Meyering wrote: > >> Can we be sure that 0x2fc12fc1 is used for all ZFS > >> implementations? > > > > If there end up being two or more magic numbers for the same file > > system (or ZFS variants go

bug#11994: [PATCH] Re: bug#11994: sort(1) doesn't say SEE ALSO uniq(1)

2012-07-20 Thread Erik Auerswald
th wrong. -- Steven Rostedt >From 8031b27b75f7f668e3ac4989297ce0a0f7e84e52 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Erik Auerswald Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 00:48:17 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] doc: mention uniq(1) in sort(1) man-page and vice versa * man/sort.x: Add SEE ALSO section with entry uniq(1). *

bug#10355: Add an option to {md5,sha*} to ignore directories

2011-12-23 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi Gilles, On 12/23/2011 02:45 PM, Gilles Espinasse wrote: I was using a way to check md5sum on a lot of file using for myfile in `cat ${ALLFILES}`; do if [ -f /${myfile} ]; then md5sum /$myfile>> $ALLFILES}.md5; fi; done But this is slow, comparing with xargs md5sum way. time (for myfile in

bug#10079: [PATCH] ln: fix position of --backup values description

2011-11-19 Thread Erik Auerswald
>From a8b44ddbfa9b1e75dbaabbe69bb535ed045fbf0a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Erik Auerswald Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 22:07:29 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] ln: fix position of --backup values description * src/ln.c (usage): A paragraph describing interactions of -s with -L and -P somehow snuck

bug#10030: grep: strange behavior with '-' in character class

2011-11-13 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On 11/12/2011 08:05 PM, Thomas Dignan wrote: echo "/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2" | grep -o '[a-zA-Z\/0-9\-\.]*' You probably want to use something like echo "/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2" | grep -o '[-a-zA-Z/0-9.]*' Note: The '-' should be the first character inside a character class if

bug#9762: tac fails when given multiple non-seekable inputs due to misuse of mkstemp()

2011-10-15 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 01:40:17PM -0700, Ambrose Feinstein wrote: > Trivial reproduction: > > $ true | tac - - > tac: cannot create temporary file in `/tmp': Invalid argument > > This is present in coreutils 8.14. This is present in coreutils 8.13 as well: $ tac <(echo a) <(echo b) tac: c

bug#8736: chmod -p --parents

2011-05-27 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 10:13:05PM +0200, francky.l...@telenet.be wrote: > > In the past, I was an advocate of the -p --parents option for > mkdir. By now this is realised. Now I'm doing the same for chmod. > [...] > I want to be able to execute the following: > > chmod a+rx -p ~/dir1/dir

bug#8575: Shell Script in Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.5 (Tikanga)

2011-04-28 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On 04/28/2011 10:42 AM, Syed Nizamuddin wrote: I get the following error . basename: invalid option -- b Try `basename --help' for more information. basename: missing operand I have basename used as CMDE=`\basename $0 .sh` echo "$basename is $CMDE" Doesn't o/p anything. Please Try CMD

bug#8500: util: where am i

2011-04-15 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, please don't top post, thanks. And keep on reading for inline comments. ;-) On 04/15/2011 09:33 AM, Panagiotis Tsiamis wrote: 2011/4/15 Bjartur Thorlacius On 4/14/11, Panagiotis Tsiamis wrote: Request for adding one more feature on the utillity whoami. The feature should be able to call

bug#8391: chmod setuid & setguid bits

2011-04-01 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 02:15:36PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > On 03/31/2011 01:58 PM, Christian wrote: > > Am 31.03.2011 20:54, schrieb Paul Eggert: > >> On 03/31/2011 11:25 AM, Christian wrote: > >>> and using "0755" is explicit enough, isn't it ? > >> Unfortunately it's not that simple, as h

bug#8391: chmod setuid & setguid bits

2011-04-01 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:54:26AM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote: > On 03/31/2011 11:25 AM, Christian wrote: > > and using "0755" is explicit enough, isn't it ? > > Unfortunately it's not that simple, as having 0755 mean > something different from 755 would violate the principle > of least surpris

bug#7463: truncate

2010-11-22 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 09:41:33AM -0500, Rupert Bruce wrote: > truncate (GNU coreutils) 7.4 > > Unexpected behavior: > > $ ls -l > total 0 > $ truncate --size 0 *.log > $ ls > *.log > > I would expect "truncate --size 0 *.log" to truncate any files ending > with ".log"; instead I get a new

bug#7372: fmt and multi-byte encodings

2010-11-12 Thread Erik Auerswald
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 11:13:20AM +0400, Ineiev wrote: > On 11/11/10, Pádraig Brady wrote: > > We're starting to apply multi-byte support, > > so hopefully this will be fixed soon. > > Could you provide a link? > > > $ echo "1 2 æ 4 5 6" | fmt -w6 > > 1 2 > > æ 4 > > 5 6 > > While should be >

bug#7042: df --help does not show `-m' option

2010-09-17 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 09:56:57AM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote: > On 16/09/10 23:34, Paul Eggert wrote: > > If we're going to make incompatible changes, I suggest that > > we solve the problem once and for all, by having "df" choose > > the default blocksize dynamically, based on the size of th

bug#6790: Problem(bug?) with basic sort command in Linux

2010-08-04 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi George, On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 01:32:55AM +0530, George Thomas Irimben (georgeti) wrote: > I would like to report a problem(bug?) I am facing with sort command in > Linux. > > Sorting of a simple text file using simple sort command is giving me > incorrect result. > > Here is the problem: >

bug#6247: Request a pause

2010-05-22 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On 05/22/2010 06:16 PM, Mark A Powell wrote: Hello, I just read the "man" for the ls command. I didn't see an option for pause, as in DOS (dir/p). There are times when it would be a great help when, viewing more than one page of files in a directory. I hope this is not something, I over l

bug#6020: coreutils-8.x: a simple feature enhancement, and how to do it

2010-04-28 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, two nit-picks regarding the test script below: On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 12:39:46AM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote: > [...] > @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ > +#!/bin/sh > +# Ensure sort -g sorts floating point limits correctly > [...] > +if test "$VERBOSE" = yes; then > + set -x > + mv --version ^^

Re: [PATCH] sort: use posix_fadvise to announce access patterns on files opened for reading

2010-03-02 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 05:33:38PM -0800, Joey Degges wrote: > Were you sure to remount your devices to clear the cache before running > these tests? While testing this patch early on the cache caused me many > incorrect readings. Another approach I took to clear the cache was to fill > up all

Re: Pinky command

2009-11-11 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 06:15:32PM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote: > hemant.ru...@us.ing.com wrote: > > In old days, attackers used to create .project symbolic to passwd > > and group files to get the List of login ids and group via > > fingerd. > > The list of uids are already public in the /etc/pa

Re: new snapshot available: coreutils-7.5.65-61cc6

2009-09-07 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi Jim, On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 11:09:21AM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: > There have been disproportionately many bug fixes since coreutils-7.5. > It's an interesting mix of fixes for recent regressions and for a few older > bugs. > > coreutils snapshot: > http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-ss.tar

Re: the unicode arrow

2009-09-07 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 07:23:12AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > According to Michal Svoboda on 9/6/2009 5:33 AM: > > When doing cp -va I can see neat quotes (depending on locale), as in > > „blah“, but the arrow is still composed of a dash and a greater-than > > symbol, as in ->. Is there any pl

Re: new snapshot available: coreutils-7.4.125-eca6

2009-08-17 Thread Erik Auerswald
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 10:51:54PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> Changes in coreutils since 7.4.115-c9c92: > > > > `make && make check` passes for me: > > - non-root user > > - glibc-2.10.1 > > - gcc-4.4.1 > > - linux-2.6.30.4 > > - x86_64 system > > Good to hear. >

Re: no feedback on snapshot? coreutils-7.5 coming soon

2009-08-12 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi Jim, On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 12:42:59PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: > AFAIK, I am the only one who has built the latest snapshot: > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.coreutils.bugs/17604 > > Though it's been only two days. > > Unless I hear of new bug reports or portability problem

Re: [PATCH] ls: Use pretty UTF-8 arrow when showing where symlinks point to

2009-08-06 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hello Lennart, On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 07:24:42PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > Diego Pettenò complained that "ls -l" doesn't use the UTF-8 arrow > character to show where symlinks point to. This tiny patch fixes that. > With this applied the character is used when the CODESET is UTF-8 > othe

Re: New sort(1) feature -- sort by length

2009-07-20 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 01:54:18PM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote: > Ethan Baldridge wrote: > > > > I'd argue on terms of obviousness: "I'm trying to sort these differently... > > I should look at the options for sort!" > > Well lots of things boil down to sorting so I think we've to be especial

Re: Problem with Hostname

2009-07-11 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 05:04:49AM -0400, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: >This command that accepts the -f option is *not* the GNU hostname >command. > > There is a small confusion, there are two versions of GNU hostname. > One that supports -f (GNU Inetutils hostname), and one that doesn't

Re: make check problems with coreutils 7.2 and earlier

2009-04-24 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hello Jim, On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 07:26:45AM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: > Tim Mooney wrote: > > > ./configure --prefix=/local/gnu --exec-prefix=/local/gnu --build > > x86_64-sun-solaris2.10 --sysconfdir=/etc/local/gnu > > --libdir=/local/gnu/lib/64 --mandir=/local/gnu/share/man > > --infodir=

Re: Did I found a bug in "ls"?

2009-03-08 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 04:15:16PM +0100, Major Péter wrote: > I would like to list some folders with they block-sizes, but only > specific folders am I interested. > So I would like to use find to list the correct folders for me: > ls `find . -type d -user foo -name "*"` > this is not workin

Re: sort -g (generic numeric) is working only for the first key

2009-03-01 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi Wasim, On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 08:09:43PM +0530, Wasim Akram S.N. wrote: > Hi, > I don't know whether the following is really a bug. > ... > wa...@wasim:~/temp$ sort -g -k1,3 -t \t a This tells sort to regard the first three fields as one key. I think you need something like "sort -g -k1,1 -k2

Re: new snapshot available: coreutils-6.12.208-2441

2008-09-27 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi Jim, On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 11:45:40AM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: > Here's a snapshot of the latest sources from coreutils > and the parts of gnulib that it uses. Please beat it up ;-) > If things work out, I may even make a test release by Wednesday. A quick glance showed me no obvious prob

Re: [PATCH] md5sum+sha*sum: add option --quiet/-q to suppress OK messages

2008-06-01 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 04:51:43PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: > Erik Auerswald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > And here it is... (attached). > > Thanks. > Here are some minor changes I expect to "amend" into your patch. > They alphabetize lists, tweak word

Re: [PATCH] md5sum+sha*sum: add option --quiet/-q to suppress OK messages

2008-06-01 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, > On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 03:31:46PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: > > Erik Auerswald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > OK, thanks. Do you want me to send an updated patch after coreutils-6.12 > > > is released? > > > > It'd be nice, an

Re: Feat-Req: uniq -c delimiter should be changable

2008-05-17 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 04:36:30PM +0200, Maximilian Haeussler wrote: > > Let's say I only want the 50 most common lines of a file: > cat textfile | sort | uniq -c | sort -n | tail -n 50 | tr -s ' ' | cut -f2 > > This will only print the first word of each line with the current uniq > versio

Re: [PATCH] md5sum+sha*sum: add option --quiet/-q to suppress OK messages

2008-05-13 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 03:31:46PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: > Erik Auerswald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > OK, thanks. Do you want me to send an updated patch after coreutils-6.12 > > is released? > > It'd be nice, and would serve

Re: [PATCH] md5sum+sha*sum: add option --quiet/-q to suppress OK messages

2008-05-13 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 03:12:57PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: > Erik Auerswald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The copyright assignment process with the FSF is completed, find the > > patch against current HEAD as an attachment. > > Thanks again. > > I ass

Re: [PATCH] md5sum+sha*sum: add option --quiet/-q to suppress OK messages

2008-05-13 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 06:33:45PM +0200, Erik Auerswald wrote: > On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 07:10:58PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: > > Erik Auerswald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 06:05:48PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: > > >> Erik

Re: [PATCH] md5sum+sha*sum: add option --quiet/-q to suppress OK messages

2008-05-04 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 07:10:58PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: > Erik Auerswald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 06:05:48PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: > >> Erik Auerswald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > IMHO md5sum and sha*sum a

  1   2   >