Re: ls -l --no-total

ative messages) to do the same. > Do it correctly, extend ls so that the user can modify the output like > for stat. > > I'm still horrified... I know this behavior is standardized but IIRC I've already read about (old) implementations that printed the `total' to st

Re: ls -l --no-total

On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 6:37am +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote: > Did I mention ls should have a --no-total option > to remove those annoying > total 1120 > without needing to pipe to a filter. Another possibility would be to output the `total' to stderr. --

Re: [PATCH] Makes sort create random order

rom 4 to 7): $ seq -r 4 7 3) Generate 4 random values (ranging from 4 to 7, seed 3): $ seq -r 4 3 7 4) Generate an endless number of random values (useful with head): $ seq -r Does anyone have suggestions on this? -- Felipe Kellermann ___ Bug-coreutils m

Re: [PATCH] Makes sort create random order

le is This glacius:~ felipek$ Here I'm using Darwin 7.7.0. -- Felipe Kellermann ___ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils

Re: Exit code of id depending on user group

On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 3:47am -0700, Paul Eggert wrote: > Felipe Kellermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > $ id fuu > > uid=1018(fuu) gid=199 groups=199 > > $ echo $? > > 1 > > > > That return code sounds strange to me given the question I did. &g

Exit code of id depending on user group

g the sources I didn't see any hints about the issue. Any suggestions or recomendations on this topic? -- Felipe Kellermann ___ Bug-coreutils mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils