On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 13:18:17 +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
> g@free.fr wrote:
>
>> - Mail original -
>>> De: "Matt Burgess"
>>> À: 11...@debbugs.gnu.org
>>> Cc: bug-gnu...@gnu.org, matt...@linuxfromscratch.org
>>> Envoyé: Lundi 2 Avril 2012 00:34:51
>>> Objet: bug#11150: getlogin test f
That's because we (LFS) dropped the uname patch from
our build instructions because upstream won't take
it in its current form. If my understanding is
correct, the correct way of implementing this feature
is by a combination of changes in the kernel & Glibc.
I don't have the skill necessary to do
Hi,
Passed Skipped Failed
\-
Linux From Scratch x86 | 362 49 0
Only one minor observation here; 'make RUN_EXPENSIVE_TESTS=yes check'
appears to result in a full rebuild of the sour
Hi Jim,
I get a 403 Forbidden error trying to download the latest ss tarballs
from both meyering.net & people.redhat.com.
What timescales did you envisage for the 8.2 release? I'll try to run
through an LFS build with it prior to the release so I can report any
issues I see *before* one of
> diff --git a/tests/misc/stty b/tests/misc/stty
> index cb3fee5..e8b2a9a 100755
> --- a/tests/misc/stty
> +++ b/tests/misc/stty
> @@ -63,8 +63,10 @@ options=`stty -a | tr -s ';' '\n' | sed "s/^
> //;$sed_del;s/-//g"`
> for opt in $options; do
># `stty parenb' and `stty -parenb' fail with this
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 00:30:05 +, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> The stty-row-col test is getting EINVAL from the system.
> Can you try running this is a terminal to see if it does the same?
>
> stty rows 40 columns 80
OK, I think I understand now.
$ stty size
25 80
$ stty rows 25 columns 80
$
$ s
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 00:30:05 +, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> The stty-row-col test is getting EINVAL from the system.
> Can you try running this is a terminal to see if it does the same?
>
> stty rows 40 columns 80
Hi Padraig,
Yes, that gives the same output:
$ stty rows 40 columns 80
stty: s
Hi,
The stty & stty-row-col tests fail for me, but I can't figure out why. I
wonder whether it's because I'm in a VirtualBox host and it's somehow
interfering with the tests? Anyway, I've attached the logs from a
verbose run of both tests. If someone wouldn't mind taking a look for
me pleas
Hi,
I've attached the testsuite log for the 1 failure I see in
Coreutils-7.1's test run. Looking back at my Coreutils-6.12
logs, the stty-row-col test was skipped in that version.
Any hints or tips as to how to investigate this further would
be much appreciated.
Thanks,
Matt.
coreutils-7.1-st
Hi Jim,
Thanks for incorporating mktemp into Coreutils. We're currently using a patch
in Linux From Scratch that installs a `tempfile' wrapper script, for those
packages still out in the wild that call `tempfile' rather than `mktemp'.
Would such a wrapper, or similar functionality be of inter
Theodoros V. Kalamatianos wrote:
On Tue, 3 Oct 2006, Jim Meyering wrote:
"Theodoros V. Kalamatianos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just downloaded coreutils-6.3 and the testsuite fails in chown/basic:
[snip]
So glibc-2.5 does not have this issue ?
I've just run a build against glibc-2.5 (
Paul Eggert wrote:
Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/lfs/development/coreutils-5.97-uname-1.patch
What would be the preferred method of seeing the -i and -p flags of
uname produce correct output on x86-linux machines? I'm assumi
Hi folks.
Firstly, the good news :-) The new experimental 6.1 release builds and
completes the testsuite fine on a recent Linux system (linux-2.6.17.8,
gcc-4.1.1, glibc-2.3.6).
Now for the nitty gritty!
There are instructions for building Coreutils at
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/vi
13 matches
Mail list logo
