he idea
of a random shredding;
(3) finally -- and more critical, perhaps -- the new default for
--iteractions forces *all* three (default) passes to be random.
I have been trying to figure a way of getting this done with minimal
changes, but have not yet succeeded (well, part of the issue is having
th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 01 Apr 2009 08:01:57 -0600
Eric Blake wrote:
> automake.git has multiple branches. Right now, the master branch is
> stuck at 1.10a, but Ralf will be fixing that in the future. But the
> next branch is at 1.10c (post-release). You probabl
reporting version 1.10a.
Where is automake 1.10b to be found?
Thanks,
..hggdh..
p.s. both autoconf and automake are GIT up-to-date.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Bug-coreutils mailing list
Bug-coreutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org
directory `/usr/src/buildd/coreutils/coreutils-git/tests'
make: Leaving directory `/usr/src/buildd/coreutils/coreutils-git/tests'
hg...@xango2:/usr/src/buildd/coreutils/coreutils-git $
..hggdh..
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Bug-coreutils mailing list
Bug-coreutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
hand again:
hg...@xango2:/usr/src/buildd/coreutils/coreutils-git $ ls > a && echo 1 && sudo
src/ginstall -Cv a b && echo 2 && sudo src/ginstall -Cv -g2 a b && echo 3 &&
sudo src/ginstall -Cv a b && echo 4 && sudo src/ginstall -Cv
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:08:55 +0100
Kamil Dudka wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 March 2009 18:31:29 Kamil Dudka wrote:
> > Any idea how to reproduce the test failure?
>
> Note I've tested it with the fresh Ubuntu installation and the
> updated one.
No, I still have no idea. It fails when running check-
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:30:18 +0100
Kamil Dudka wrote:
> Now just tested on the Gentoo Linux with similar configuration,
> running the test install/install-C-root in the loop, still not able
> to reproduce. Can I download a snapshot of Debian with your
> configuration somewhere? Or is it reproduci
tion somewhere? Or is it reproducible on the released one?
>
I am running Ubuntu 9.04 Alpha 6 (sort of, it is Alpha 5 with updates).
The kernel is an optional test kernel; 9.04 will ship with 2.6.28; I
will reboot and run with the current official 2.6.28, and test.
..hggdh..
signature
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:17:24 +0100
Kamil Dudka wrote:
> Thank you for the report. Unfortunately I am not able to reproduce
> it. Can you give me more details?
> - architecture
> - kernel
> - glibc version (if any)
Sorry for the delay.
hg...@xango2:/usr/src/buildd/coreutils-git/tests/install $ d
Every so often I run a make check, and (more eventually) a root make
check. After a git pull & remake this morning, I ran a root check, and
got a failure on install-C-root.
I am unsure on what was intended, or if even this failure is real (I am
not familiar, yet, with ginstall), but decided to pos
Hello,
I sent the email below sometime ago; since there was no response, I
decided to propose a patch in order to have the title line also indented
by --indent.
Regards,
..hggdh..
diff --git a/src/pr.c b/src/pr.c
index 308a025..331762f 100644
--- a/src/pr.c
+++ b/src/pr.c
@@ -2399,13 +2399,13
Original Ubuntu bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/coreutils/+bug/331817
original bug description
While the pr command recognizes the --indent (-o) option, page headers are
printed without indentation.
Expected results (for example, version 5.2.1 from CentOS 4):
$ ls /usr/bi
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:29:15 +0300
Robert Wamala wrote:
> Thx for advise
> can you please help me as per my question.
No, we cannot. As Eric stated in the previous email:
> > But you are asking about 'curl'. I am sorry but this is the wrong
> > mailing list. We do not maintain 'curl' here. I
shred: test1.data: pass 1/3
(random)...
/usr/src/buildd/coreutils-git/src/shred: test1.data: pass 2/3
(00)...
/usr/src/buildd/coreutils-git/src/shred: test1.data: pass 3/3
(ff)...
real0m2.430s
user0m0.020s
sys 0m2.020s
hg...@xango2:/tmp $ ls -l test1.data
-rw-r--r-- 1 hggdh hggd
/urandom
of=/dev/null
100+0 records in
100+0 records out
104857600 bytes (105 MB) copied, 20.3969 s, 5.1 MB/s
hg...@xango2:~/shred-test $
Regards,
..hggdh..
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Bug-coreutils mailing lis
rion, 2 cores @ 2GHz. The disk interface is a SATA UDMA/133.
Please keep in mind I have not yet run a real performance test (multiple
runs, multiple file sizes).
Regards,
..hggdh..
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
...
real0m22.306s
user0m0.056s
sys 0m11.601s
hg...@xango2:/tmp $ time shred --verbose test.data
shred: test.data: pass 1/3 (random)...
shred: test.data: pass 2/3 (random)...
shred: test.data: pass 3/3 (random)...
real0m8.985s
user0m0.020s
sys 0m8.185s
hg...@xango2:/tmp $ ls -l t
he trick nicely, as long as a smaller
number of passes is used.
Example runs:
Files involved:
hg...@xango2:/tmp $ ls -l usr*
-rw-r--r-- 1 hggdh hggdh 23921846 2009-01-16 16:07 usr.delta
-rw-r--r-- 1 hggdh hggdh 71766016 2009-01-16 16:18 usr.shred
hg...@xango2:/tmp $
Null random source (/dev/zer
On Sat, 2008-11-08 at 19:51 +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Ondřej Vašík <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I googled a bit about that "french" issue, it was already reported to
> > translation team. Answer was that it could be caused by translation like
> > "report all bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]" instead
On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 09:38 +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Thanks.
> Those "failures" show merely that you built with profiling
> in such a way that every binary drops a gmon.out file in the
> current directory. Then, any test that expects certain files
> to be present finds an anomaly: the unexpect
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 16:37 +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
> > I have run the tests both as root and as a normal user. I have
> failures
> > on both runs.
> >
> > I ran the tests as 'make tests', which I *think* was what was
> required.
>
> Thanks for testing.
>
> > Do you want the failures?
>
> O
I have run the tests both as root and as a normal user. I have failures
on both runs.
I ran the tests as 'make tests', which I *think* was what was required.
Do you want the failures?
Linux AMD64 Ubuntu Intrepid (8.10) post-beta.
Regards,
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
Hello,
I have been following the bug-coreutils mailist for a while, in order to
get myself adjusted to the expected processes and procedures.
I noticed there is https://savannah.gnu.org/support/?group=coreutils
where we could submit downstream issues. But it seems this is not much
used.
So the q
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 17:43 -0400, jrl wrote:
> can't log in as root
> am using directions from forums FAQ
> bash: su-: command not foundis the error msg.
I am not sure what this has to do with coreutils, so you probably want
to pursue any other questions on an appropriate forum.
Just in cas
24 matches
Mail list logo
