"James Youngman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 18, 2008 11:12 PM, Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Thanks for pursuing this.
>> Same tests as before?
>
> Yes, one had to be removed (it verified that no oder checking was done
> by default).
>
>> IMHO, it's good to keep them in the sa
On Feb 18, 2008 11:12 PM, Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for pursuing this.
> Same tests as before?
Yes, one had to be removed (it verified that no oder checking was done
by default).
> IMHO, it's good to keep them in the same change set.
>
> There are a few trailing blanks, too
James Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch amends my previous changes to join.c to enable
> order-checking by default for the case where the user is not making
> use of the extension of processing unsorted inputs containing only
> pairable lines. This idea was suggestied by Pádraig Bra
This patch amends my previous changes to join.c to enable
order-checking by default for the case where the user is not making
use of the extension of processing unsorted inputs containing only
pairable lines. This idea was suggestied by Pádraig Brady.
2008-02-18 James Youngman <[EMAIL PROTEC
