Re: FW: Documentation of POSIXLY_CORRECT

2009-11-16 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello, Eric Blake writes: By the way, if you want to be portable to Solaris /bin/sh, you have to use: export POSIXLY_CORRECT POSIXLY_CORRECT= (the two lines can appear in either order). FWIW, you need to re-export a variable each time you change it; otherwise, it is possible that the

Re: FW: Documentation of POSIXLY_CORRECT

2009-11-16 Thread Eric Blake
Ralf Wildenhues Ralf.Wildenhues at gmx.de writes: export POSIXLY_CORRECT POSIXLY_CORRECT= (the two lines can appear in either order). FWIW, you need to re-export a variable each time you change it; otherwise, it is possible that the variable has the new value, but the environment

Re: FW: Documentation of POSIXLY_CORRECT

2009-11-16 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Eric Blake writes: | Therefore you should `export' again each environment variable that | you update; the export can occur before or after the assignment. You only have to do the export once for the life of the shell, not once per assignment. Yep, you're right. Sorry for the confusion,

Documentation of POSIXLY_CORRECT

2009-11-11 Thread Schwarz, Konrad
Hi, Section 2.11, Standards conformance, of coreutils.info is worded ambigously with regards to POSIXLY_CORRECT. The current text says [...] define the `POSIXLY_CORRECT' environment variable. I took this to mean that the variable needs to be exported (export POSIXLY_CORRECT), but it needs to

Re: Documentation of POSIXLY_CORRECT

2009-11-11 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Schwarz, Konrad on 11/11/2009 4:45 AM: The current text says [...] define the `POSIXLY_CORRECT' environment variable. I took this to mean that the variable needs to be exported (export POSIXLY_CORRECT), Correct. but it needs to

FW: Documentation of POSIXLY_CORRECT

2009-11-11 Thread Schwarz, Konrad
-Original Message- From: Schwarz, Konrad Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 2:31 PM To: 'Eric Blake' Subject: RE: Documentation of POSIXLY_CORRECT Hello Eric, thanks for taking this up. Here is a session transcript that exhibits the bug: $ unset POSIXLY_CORRECT $ du

Re: Documentation of POSIXLY_CORRECT

2009-11-11 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [please keep the list in the loop, and please don't top-post on technical discussions] According to Schwarz, Konrad on 11/11/2009 6:31 AM: Hello Eric, thanks for taking this up. Here is a session transcript that exhibits the bug: $ unset

Re: FW: Documentation of POSIXLY_CORRECT

2009-11-11 Thread Pádraig Brady
Schwarz, Konrad wrote: -Original Message- From: Schwarz, Konrad Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 2:31 PM To: 'Eric Blake' Subject: RE: Documentation of POSIXLY_CORRECT Hello Eric, thanks for taking this up. Here is a session transcript that exhibits the bug