Re: Test failures in coreutils-5.3.0 on cygwin

2005-01-19 Thread Paul Eggert
Eric Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: POSIX requires that a group name that is completely numeric (yes, that is a portable group name) takes preference over a group number. That's awkward. The obvious workaround is to keep prepending 0s until you come up with a name that's not used. But I'd

Re: Test failures in coreutils-5.3.0 on cygwin

2005-01-19 Thread Jim Meyering
Eric Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... Also, I noticed some other tests in the suite that were sensitive to group names. At the moment, I'm not on the machine where I noticed all the problems, but off the top of my head, I remember that at least chown/separator was calling `id' directly

Re: Test failures in coreutils-5.3.0 on cygwin

2005-01-17 Thread Paul Eggert
Eric Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2005-01/msg00063.html Conceivably this problem could occur on Unix too. I installed this patch to work around it (on Unix, anyway) by using group numbers rather than names. 2005-01-17 Paul Eggert [EMAIL

make -k fails on cygwin [Was: Test failures in coreutils-5.3.0 on cygwin]

2005-01-14 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [cross-posted to cygwin and automake lists] I'm not sure if the bug below is with cygwin's mods to make, in automake for using non-portable Makefile constructs, or in both. According to Jim Meyering on 1/12/2005 9:45 AM: If you run `make -k check',

Re: Test failures in coreutils-5.3.0 on cygwin

2005-01-12 Thread Bruno Haible
Eric Blake wrote: Actually, the tarball includes AM_GNU_GETTEXT_VERSION(0.13.1), the latest version of autopoint is 0.14.1, but some of the gettext .m4 files are newer than the 0.14.1 version. To get a good reconf, I had to use `AUTOPOINT=true autoreconf -fiv', skipping autopoint, because

Re: Test failures in coreutils-5.3.0 on cygwin

2005-01-12 Thread Eric Blake
According to Jim Meyering on 1/11/2005 10:09 AM: Once I manually patched the corresponding Makefile.ins, I don't get very far into the testsuite (1 of 5 failed under tests/chgrp), see coreutils.check3. I haven't yet had time to figure out how to get any further. As for tests/chgrp/basic,

Re: Test failures in coreutils-5.3.0 on cygwin

2005-01-12 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Jim Meyering on 1/12/2005 6:43 AM: autoreconf should work fine. Why are you using -f (--force)? Or -i (--install) for that matter? Using autoreconf (without -f) should work fine. Habit, I guess. You were correct that it worked

Test failures in coreutils-5.3.0 on cygwin

2005-01-11 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The 5.3.0 testsuite does not even get a chance to run on cygwin, because the check-README target of src/Makefile does not take into account ${EXEEXT}. See the attached coreutils.check, and my proposed patch below. However, I didn't have automake