bug#25078: ls 8.26: discrepancy between `ls' and `ls -1' in the alignment of quoted and nonquoted items

2016-11-30 Thread Zhiming Wang
coreutils 8.26 includes the following improvement: > ls now aligns quoted items with non quoted items, which is easier to read, > and also better indicates that the quote is not part of the actual name. which I find to be a welcome addition to the quoting behavior introduced in 8.25. However, thi

bug#25078: ls 8.26: discrepancy between `ls' and `ls -1' in the alignment of quoted and nonquoted items

2016-11-30 Thread Pádraig Brady
On 30/11/16 20:19, Zhiming Wang wrote: > coreutils 8.26 includes the following improvement: > >> ls now aligns quoted items with non quoted items, which is easier to read, >> and also better indicates that the quote is not part of the actual name. > > which I find to be a welcome addition to the

bug#25078: ls 8.26: discrepancy between `ls' and `ls -1' in the alignment of quoted and nonquoted items

2016-11-30 Thread Zhiming Wang
> On Nov 30, 2016, at 4:35 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote: > > When `ls -1` is used interactively it can be handy to triple click to > select the whole line, in which case selecting just the file name without > leading space would be preferred. I had this thought as well because I've been triple clicki

bug#25078: ls 8.26: discrepancy between `ls' and `ls -1' in the alignment of quoted and nonquoted items

2016-11-30 Thread Paul Vint
The alignment change is helpful, but I do have an argument against doing the same in the -1 case: It breaks something many of us have done in scripts. Of course we *know* that ls -1 isn't the best way to go, but for quickie scripts it has been the standby for many. Also, I cannot come up with a go

bug#25078: ls 8.26: discrepancy between `ls' and `ls -1' in the alignment of quoted and nonquoted items

2016-11-30 Thread Zhiming Wang
On Nov 30, 2016, at 8:41 PM, Paul Vint wrote: > The alignment change is helpful, but I do have an argument against doing the > same in the -1 case: It breaks something many of us have done in scripts. It breaks nothing. Quoting and alignment by default only happens when stdout is a tty. Also, ls

bug#25078: ls 8.26: discrepancy between `ls' and `ls -1' in the alignment of quoted and nonquoted items

2018-12-13 Thread Assaf Gordon
Hello, On 2016-11-30 7:12 p.m., Zhiming Wang wrote: On Nov 30, 2016, at 8:41 PM, Paul Vint wrote: The alignment change is helpful, but I do have an argument against doing the same in the -1 case: It breaks something many of us have done in scripts. It breaks nothing. Quoting and alignment by

bug#25078: ls 8.26: discrepancy between `ls' and `ls -1' in the alignment of quoted and nonquoted items

2018-12-13 Thread Zhiming Wang
On Dec 13, 2018, at 3:27 PM, Assaf Gordon wrote: > > We created a summary of common issues and FAQs > regarding the quoting change in ls(1): > https://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/quotes.html > > If there is an issue that is not addressed there, > please send an email to coreut...@gnu.org .

bug#25078: ls 8.26: discrepancy between `ls' and `ls -1' in the alignment of quoted and nonquoted items

2018-12-15 Thread Assaf Gordon
Hello, On 2018-12-13 5:18 p.m., Zhiming Wang wrote: On Dec 13, 2018, at 3:27 PM, Assaf Gordon wrote: https://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/quotes.html - The page doesn't seem to be linked from anywhere; not the coreutils FAQ, not the manual. So discoverability seems rather poor?