On 2019-02-09 1:18 p.m., Ricky Tigg wrote:
Covered object by values '1994 s', '2014.25 s' seems to be a unique
time elapsed. Those values can therefore be expected to be identical,
either '1994 s' or '2014.25 s' – 2014 s and 25 hundredths of s –.
The command was:
# dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdc
Covered object by values '1994 s', '2014.25 s' seems to be a unique
time elapsed. Those values can therefore be expected to be identical,
either '1994 s' or '2014.25 s' – 2014 s and 25 hundredths of s –.
severity 34345 wishlist
retitle 34345 dd: report elapsed time as HH:MM:SS.NNN
stop
Hello,
Ricky Tigg's original message was sent to coreut...@gnu.org
(not to bug-coreutils@gnu.org), and did not create a new bug report:
https://lists.gnu.org/r/coreutils/2019-02/msg3.html
This is of c
On 2/6/2019 1:36 AM, Ricky Tigg wrote:
> Enhancements request
> Hi. Command executed:
>
>
>- Could values reported at '(8.0 GB, 7.5 GiB)' be displayed using a two
>fractional digits accuracy (model 1.23 GiB).
>
Nah
Implies more accuracy than there is.
Use 2-3 digit
