bug#36130: split bug

2019-06-26 Thread Heather Wick
Thank you for all your help. I will let you know if I run into any more issues. For whatever reason, putting the program on verbose has let it run with no issues that I can determine related to my initial problems. Thanks, ~ Heather On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 10:56 AM Assaf Gordon wrote: > tag

bug#36130: split bug

2019-06-26 Thread Assaf Gordon
tag 36130 notabug close 36130 stop Hello, On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 04:50:20PM -0600, Assaf Gordon wrote: > On 2019-06-10 12:28 p.m., Heather Wick wrote: > > Verbose: This seems to have made the same number of files this time; not > > sure why the other 3-4 times I ran it it did not. They appear

bug#36130: split bug

2019-06-10 Thread Assaf Gordon
Hello, On 2019-06-10 12:28 p.m., Heather Wick wrote: Thank you so much for your response. Here are the results of the tests you sent: Verbose: This seems to have made the same number of files this time; not sure why the other 3-4 times I ran it it did not. They appear to be the same size,

bug#36130: split bug

2019-06-10 Thread Pádraig Brady
On 10/06/19 19:28, Heather Wick wrote: > Thank you so much for your response. Here are the results of the tests you > sent: > Verbose: This seems to have made the same number of files this time; not > sure why the other 3-4 times I ran it it did not. They appear to be the > same size, with paired

bug#36130: split bug

2019-06-10 Thread Heather Wick
Thank you so much for your response. Here are the results of the tests you sent: Verbose: This seems to have made the same number of files this time; not sure why the other 3-4 times I ran it it did not. They appear to be the same size, with paired last reads (base) [hwick@zappalogin

bug#36130: split bug

2019-06-07 Thread Assaf Gordon
Hello, On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 09:48:44PM -0400, Heather Wick wrote: > Yes, sorry, I should have specified that I already checked that the > original fastq files are indeed paired and sorted with the same number of > lines and same starting/ending IDs, narrowing down the issue to a problem > with

bug#36130: split bug

2019-06-07 Thread Heather Wick
Hi, Yes, sorry, I should have specified that I already checked that the original fastq files are indeed paired and sorted with the same number of lines and same starting/ending IDs, narrowing down the issue to a problem with split. ~ Heather (base) [hwick@zappalogin ~]$ zcat MH2_R2.fastq.gz |

bug#36130: split bug

2019-06-07 Thread Assaf Gordon
Hello, On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 02:23:15PM -0400, Heather Wick wrote: > I am using split to split up some large, paired fastq files [...]: > > zcat MH1_R1.fastq.gz | split - -l 4000 DHT_R1_ > zcat MH1_R2.fastq.gz | split - -l 4000 DHT_R2_ > > This creates 96 chunks for the R1 and 95

bug#36130: split bug

2019-06-07 Thread Heather Wick
Hello, I am using split to split up some large, paired fastq files (nearly 4 billion lines each). I am using the -l flag to split into files of 10 million reads (40 million lines) each and though the fastq files have matched and sorted reads, split is creating different numbers of split files for