On 6/17/20 7:22 AM, Jacek Wielemborek wrote:
Hi!
First of all, thanks for maintaining GNU sort! I use it very often and love
its performance.
Today I spent some time debugging and realized that my bug was caused by a
wrong GNU invocation ("sort -k1,1 -t," instead of "sort -t, -k1,1"). Could
sor
Hi!
First of all, thanks for maintaining GNU sort! I use it very often and love
its performance.
Today I spent some time debugging and realized that my bug was caused by a
wrong GNU invocation ("sort -k1,1 -t," instead of "sort -t, -k1,1"). Could
sort warn when -t is effectively a no-op because i
