Fair enough. I didn't see anything about that in the help or man page,
perhaps a note should be added there?
On Wed., 30 Sep. 2020, 7:11 am Pádraig Brady, wrote:
> On 29/09/2020 15:20, Assaf Gordon wrote:
> >
> >> On 29/09/2020 02:18, ned haughton wrote:
> >>> When splitting with -d, the
On 29/09/2020 15:20, Assaf Gordon wrote:
On 29/09/2020 02:18, ned haughton wrote:
When splitting with -d, the numbering screws up after 89:
In addition to Pádraig explanation, please see previous similar
discussion here:
On 29/09/2020 02:18, ned haughton wrote:
When splitting with -d, the numbering screws up after 89:
In addition to Pádraig explanation, please see previous similar
discussion here:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2017-02/msg00050.html
http://bugs.gnu.org/25832
tag 43684 notabug
close 43684
stop
On 29/09/2020 02:18, ned haughton wrote:
When splitting with -d, the numbering screws up after 89:
It behaves like that on purpose so that there is no limit on the
number of file names to split, and so that normal globbing will
result in the correct order
When splitting with -d, the numbering screws up after 89:
```
$ wc -l ../lat_lon_full
110324 ../lat_lon_full
$ split -d ../lat_lon_full lat_lon_
$ ls
lat_lon_00 lat_lon_09 lat_lon_18 lat_lon_27 lat_lon_36 lat_lon_45
lat_lon_54 lat_lon_63 lat_lon_72 lat_lon_81 lat_lon_9000
