Assaf Gordon wrote:
Can this be closed as out-dated?
Yes, that's fine. Closing.
(triaging old bugs)
Hello,
On 17/04/11 10:28 AM, Paul Eggert wrote:
On 04/17/11 01:55, Jim Meyering wrote:
Now that we have FIEMAP support, (by the looks of things
we will soon have SEEK_HOLE support in cp and in the linux kernel)
do you think adding support for this special case is
Paul Eggert wrote:
(By oodles faster I mean as much faster as you like.
The benchmark below shows a 2800x speedup.)
In response to an idea by Kit Westneat for GNU tar reported in
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-tar/2010-08/msg00038.html,
Eric Blake wrote:
Meanwhile, if you are indeed
On 04/17/11 01:55, Jim Meyering wrote:
Now that we have FIEMAP support, (by the looks of things
we will soon have SEEK_HOLE support in cp and in the linux kernel)
do you think adding support for this special case is worthwhile?
I could go either way.
If so, would you care to rebase it for
(By oodles faster I mean as much faster as you like.
The benchmark below shows a 2800x speedup.)
In response to an idea by Kit Westneat for GNU tar reported in
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-tar/2010-08/msg00038.html,
Eric Blake wrote:
Meanwhile, if you are indeed correct that there are
