tags 8320 notabug
close 8320
thanks
Voelker, Bernhard wrote:
> Paul Eggert wrote:
>> On 03/22/2011 08:47 AM, Voelker, Bernhard wrote:
>>> BTW: why are `Z' and `Y' "too large"?
>>
>>They don't fit in 64 bits.
>
> wow, I wasn't aware that there are already 128-bit systems!
Hi Voelker,
It looks like
Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 03/22/2011 08:47 AM, Voelker, Bernhard wrote:
>> BTW: why are `Z' and `Y' "too large"?
>
>They don't fit in 64 bits.
wow, I wasn't aware that there are already 128-bit systems!
Bye,
Berny
On 03/22/2011 08:47 AM, Voelker, Bernhard wrote:
> shouldn't it return
> 0[TPE] for the "Used" column, as rounding a value of 17% should lead to
> zero (mathematically)?
df always rounds up, rather than to nearest.
I vaguely recall that POSIX specifies that, for -k.
> BTW: why are `Z' and `Y' "to
Running `df -B...` with a SIZE which is greater than the total disk space
returns the same value in the 'Used' and 'Available' column - see example
below with T, P and E:
$ for f in 1 K M G T P E Z Y ; do ( set -x && df -B$f . ) ; done
+ df -B1 .
Filesystem 1B-blocks Used Available
