bug#9266: tail -F does not follow through symlinks

2011-08-09 Thread Bart Vanhaute
When I use tail -F to follow a file that is a symlink to another file, and that second file gets replaced, tail no longer follows the new file. I am not sure if this scenario is actually supported, but the current behaviour is unexpected to me. Detailed scenario to reproduce: in one terminal: $ l

bug#9266: tail -F does not follow through symlinks

2011-08-09 Thread Jim Meyering
Bart Vanhaute wrote: > When I use tail -F to follow a file that is a symlink to another file, > and that second file gets replaced, tail no longer follows the new > file. I am not sure if this scenario is actually supported, but the > current behaviour is unexpected to me. > > Detailed scenario to

bug#9266: tail -F does not follow through symlinks

2018-10-30 Thread Assaf Gordon
tags 9266 notabug close 9266 stop (triaging old bugs) On 2011-08-09 10:28 a.m., Jim Meyering wrote: Bart Vanhaute wrote: When I use tail -F to follow a file that is a symlink to another file, and that second file gets replaced, tail no longer follows the new file. I am not sure if this scenar