Re: coreutils-6.0: numerous test failures on MacOS X

2006-08-29 Thread Paul Eggert
Bruno Haible [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The process that hangs has the command line tail -f -n 1. I installed the following patch to coreutils in an attempt to fix this. It uses the new isapipe module of gnulib. I think this finishes off the MacOS X problems you've reported recently.

Re: coreutils-6.0: numerous test failures on MacOS X

2006-08-29 Thread Paul Eggert
Bruno Haible [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Single-stepping with next yields a loop in tail.c: This is because 'tail' is confused again about the distinction between pipes and sockets. This is a bit of a can of worms (it was the topic of a discussion on the Open Group a while ago, so I knew about

Re: coreutils-6.0: numerous test failures on MacOS X

2006-08-28 Thread Bruno Haible
+ dd iflag=nofollow if=dd-sym.20477 count=0 + fail=1 ... It seems that the nofollow test doesn't work? What does ktrace tell you about the system calls that were executed? I assume MacOS X has ktrace? cd src ln -s dd.c sym ktrace ./dd iflag=nofollow if=sym count=0 kdump

Re: coreutils-6.0: numerous test failures on MacOS X

2006-08-28 Thread Paul Eggert
I installed this patch to coreutils to address the O_DIRECTORY problem; it assumes the new gnulib fcntl module. 2006-08-28 Paul Eggert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Adjust to recent gnulib changes for the gnulib module. * bootstrap.conf (gnulib_modules): Add fcntl. * src/system.h

Re: coreutils-6.0: numerous test failures on MacOS X

2006-08-16 Thread Paul Eggert
Bruno Haible [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 2006-08-16 Bruno Haible [EMAIL PROTECTED] * tests/lang-default: Set LC_ALL to C, not empty. I think this is the right sort of fix, though I'm puzzled as to why the code set LC_ALL to the empty string in the first place. This dates back to this

Re: coreutils-6.0: numerous test failures on MacOS X

2006-08-16 Thread Bruno Haible
Paul Eggert wrote: I think this is the right sort of fix, though I'm puzzled as to why the code set LC_ALL to the empty string in the first place. ... Do you recall why they were set to '' back then? Yes, my archives tell me: On 2000-10-15, I sent Jim a mail, reporting testsuite failures,

Re: coreutils-6.0: numerous test failures on MacOS X

2006-08-16 Thread Paul Eggert
Bruno Haible [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: After this is fixed, only dd/misc fails, and tail/tail-tests hangs. Thanks. Your email didn't mention tail/tail-tests after that -- is that problem known and fixed, or should we look into it further? + dd iflag=nofollow if=dd-sym.20477 count=0 + fail=1