Hi,
I noticed that du takes a long time to scan directories and measure
disk usage.
I was thinking that perhaps caching the size of directories could bu
useful. Perhaps, after du computes the size of a directory, it could
write its size in its extended attributes (if the filesystem support
it).
Mildred [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I was thinking that perhaps caching the size of directories could bu
useful. Perhaps, after du computes the size of a directory, it could
write its size in its extended attributes (if the filesystem support
it). Next time, du would only compare the directory
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008, Mildred wrote:
I was thinking that perhaps caching the size of directories could bu
useful. Perhaps, after du computes the size of a directory, it could
write its size in its extended attributes (if the filesystem support
it). Next time, du would only compare the directory
Mildred wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that du takes a long time to scan directories and measure
disk usage.
I was thinking that perhaps caching the size of directories could bu
useful. Perhaps, after du computes the size of a directory, it could
write its size in its extended attributes (if the
Le Thu 03/07/2008 à 14:29 Philip Rowlands à écrit:
Unfortunately neither the atime nor mtime of a directory would
necessarily show a change to the disk usage of the enclosed files.
Consider a logfile, for example; the filesize grows continuously, but
makes no change to the directory.