find a document bug for expr

2007-09-18 Thread hanpingtian
hi, I think I have found a document bug for expr: in the info page of "String expressions", it says "`expr' supports pattern matching and other string operators. These have *lower* precedence than both the numeric and ...",. But I think the string expressions have *higher* precedence than numeric

Re: find a document bug for expr

2007-09-19 Thread Jim Meyering
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I think I have found a document bug for expr: > in the info page of "String expressions", it says "`expr' supports > pattern matching and other string operators. These have *lower* > precedence than both the numeric and ...",. > But I think the string expressions have *h

Re: find a document bug for expr

2007-09-19 Thread Andreas Schwab
Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > @@ -10884,8 +10884,9 @@ To make @command{expr} interpret keywords as strings, > you must use the > @cindex expressions, numeric > > @command{expr} supports the usual numeric operators, in order of increasing > -precedence. The string operators (previo

Re: find a document bug for expr

2007-09-19 Thread Jim Meyering
Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> @@ -10884,8 +10884,9 @@ To make @command{expr} interpret keywords as >> strings, you must use the >> @cindex expressions, numeric >> >> @command{expr} supports the usual numeric operators, in order of incr