> Pádraig Brady wrote:
> > Markus Duft wrote:
[snip]
>
> Thanks for looking at that, Pádraig.
> I agree.
>
> Note that there are other uses of select with 0 as first argument.
> These affect the poll ans select modules:
>
> $ git grep -l 'select (0'
> lib/poll.c
> lib/winsock-select.
> > That looks fine as the first param to select
> > is the highest-numbered file descriptor + 1.
> > Arguably 1 is more correct than 0.
I think this patch is fine. OTOH 1 is *not* more correct than 0, because it
implies that fd 0 might be tested.
The other uses are for WinSock only, so they sh
Jim Meyering writes:
> + * lib/nanosleep.c (my_usleep): Use 1, not 0, as the first argument.
> + This avoids a failure on Interix 3.5. Details in
> + http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.coreutils.bugs/16077
Is this the best solution? It seems that another solution would be to
de
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> Markus Duft wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I have a more or less trivial patch for the nanosleep replacement for
>> interix. The problem I ran into is, that select() has a bug, making it fail
>> with "bad address" if the number of fd's to select on is zero. Setting the
>> set-size to 1
Markus Duft wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have a more or less trivial patch for the nanosleep replacement for
> interix. The problem I ran into is, that select() has a bug, making it fail
> with "bad address" if the number of fd's to select on is zero. Setting the
> set-size to 1 solves the problem, and shou
Hi!
I have a more or less trivial patch for the nanosleep replacement for
interix. The problem I ran into is, that select() has a bug, making it fail
with "bad address" if the number of fd's to select on is zero. Setting the
set-size to 1 solves the problem, and should not damage anything else aro
