Re: join bug

2008-03-05 Thread Bob Proulx
Martin, Martin Schmeing wrote: Hi Bob, Join works fine with my test smaller files, giving an appropriate output. When both files are 1000 (short) lines long, it outputs maybe one or two of the joined lines, but there should be hundreds output. The files are sorted, and there is no error

join bug

2008-02-29 Thread Martin Schmeing
Hello, Is there a size limit for the input files for join? I want to do it with large files, but even files of 1000 lines fail Thanks, Martin ___ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils

join bug?

2007-06-20 Thread Tiago Junqueira
Hi, I was trying to attach 2 files, join -1 1 -2 1 Received_Packets Sent_Packets The problem is, after the packet nr82, there is more numbers that match, and the program just join the files until the packet nr82. and file Received_Packets is: 4 25.109191 5 25.199239 6

Re: join bug?

2007-06-20 Thread Andreas Schwab
Tiago Junqueira [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Why i get after the command: 4 25.109191 25.00960 Your input is not sorted. $ join --help [...] Important: FILE1 and FILE2 must be sorted on the join fields. E.g., use `sort -k 1b,1' if `join' has no options. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE

join bug?

2006-09-20 Thread Erez PERELMAN
hey, i think there is a bug in join command. i'm joining two sorted files and there is no joining for an expected mapping. here is the example: f1: 79 53 f2: 791 834 79 82 join f1 f2 == blank if i change f2 to: 1791 834 79 82 join f1 f2 == 79 53 82 thanks, erez

Re: join bug?

2006-09-20 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Erez PERELMAN on 9/19/2006 11:44 AM: hey, i think there is a bug in join command. i'm joining two sorted files and there is no joining for an expected mapping. here is the example: f1: 79 53 f2: 791 834 79 82 Not a bug. join

Re: join bug?

2006-02-06 Thread german rigau
On 2/6/06, Paul Eggert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: german rigau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Obviously, the problem is in the sort command. With C locale runs perfectly. However, I use LANG=en_US.UTF-8 ... And then it seems that the sort command have different behaviour ... I don't see any

Re: join bug?

2006-02-06 Thread Paul Eggert
german rigau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If you see carefully the last example I sent, we obtain two different sortings with locale en_US.UTF-8 ... with sort kk2 we obtain icecream before ice_cream and with sort -k 1,2 kk2 we obtain ice_cream before icecream! That is because in that locale, _

Re: join bug?

2006-02-05 Thread Paul Eggert
german rigau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Obviously, the problem is in the sort command. With C locale runs perfectly. However, I use LANG=en_US.UTF-8 ... And then it seems that the sort command have different behaviour ... I don't see any bug in the examples that you gave. Getting back to the

Re: join bug?

2006-02-03 Thread german rigau
Hello again, Thanks a lot for you quick reply ... But, BOTH files were sorted previously with default options. [EMAIL PROTECTED] BaseConcepts]$ cat kk1 ice_cream%1:13:00:: life_style%1:07:00:: part-time%3:00:00:: [EMAIL PROTECTED] BaseConcepts]$ cat kk2 ice_cream%1:13:00:: 07510835 1 1

Re: join bug?

2006-02-03 Thread german rigau
Hello again, It seems to me that the problem is on the sort command ... [EMAIL PROTECTED] BaseConcepts]$ sort kk2 icecream%1:13:00:: 07510835 1 0 ice_cream%1:13:00:: 07510835 1 1 life_style%1:07:00:: 04875322 1 2 part-time%3:00:00:: 01131371 1 21 [EMAIL PROTECTED] BaseConcepts]$ sort -k 1,2 kk2

Re: join bug?

2006-02-03 Thread german rigau
On 2/3/06, Paul Eggert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: german rigau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] BaseConcepts]$ more kk2.sort icecream%1:13:00:: 07510835 1 0 ice_cream%1:13:00:: 07510835 1 1 life_style%1:07:00:: 04875322 1 2 part-time%3:00:00:: 01131371 1 21 kk2.sort isn't

join bug?

2006-02-02 Thread german rigau
Just in case this is really a bug... I'm using version 5.2.1 of coreutils on a fedora core 4. Consider joining these two files ordered with default options: [EMAIL PROTECTED] BaseConcepts]$ more kk1.sort ice_cream%1:13:00:: life_style%1:07:00:: part-time%3:00:00:: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: join bug?

2006-02-02 Thread Paul Eggert
german rigau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] BaseConcepts]$ more kk2.sort icecream%1:13:00:: 07510835 1 0 ice_cream%1:13:00:: 07510835 1 1 life_style%1:07:00:: 04875322 1 2 part-time%3:00:00:: 01131371 1 21 kk2.sort isn't sorted correctly, at least not for the default C locale.