Re: sc_tight_scope on cygwin

2009-03-27 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Jim Meyering on 3/27/2009 1:13 AM: >> Nope. Cygwin doesn't use glibc, so 'info libc' fails to turn up anything >> at all. Do you have a preferred way to skip this test on non-Linux >> platforms, since glibc's info manual is unlikely to a

Re: sc_tight_scope on cygwin

2009-03-27 Thread Jim Meyering
Eric Blake wrote: > According to Jim Meyering on 3/26/2009 7:32 AM: >>> failing on sc_strftime_check, with "info: No menu item `date' in node >>> `(libc.info.gz)Top'"). >> >> For me, that rule's "info libc date calendar format" command >> prints the "21.4.5 Formatting Calendar Time" section. >> Not

Re: sc_tight_scope on cygwin

2009-03-26 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Jim Meyering on 3/26/2009 7:32 AM: >> failing on sc_strftime_check, with "info: No menu item `date' in node >> `(libc.info.gz)Top'"). > > For me, that rule's "info libc date calendar format" command > prints the "21.4.5 Formatting Calenda

Re: sc_tight_scope on cygwin

2009-03-26 Thread Jim Meyering
Eric Blake wrote: > My next 'make syntax-check' failure comes from sc_tight_scope. On cygwin, > all exported symbols include a leading underscore, so the check complains > about a large number of these: Thanks for testing! > The attached patch relaxes that rule in sr

sc_tight_scope on cygwin

2009-03-26 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 My next 'make syntax-check' failure comes from sc_tight_scope. On cygwin, all exported symbols include a leading underscore, so the check complains about a large number of these: _main _usage along with several other false positives, f