"Conrad T. Pino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The CVS project compiles the Windows CVS binary with Microsoft Visual
> Studio 6.0 which doesn't have a "fchdir" implementation which is used
> in "save-cwd.c" module. The comments say:
>
>Some systems lack fchdir altogether: e.g., OS/2, pre-2001 C
Jim Meyering wrote:
> Is it an option to use a more modern/POSIX-compliant development
> environment on Windows? I know that Cygwin now has fchdir
> and it looks
> like MKS has support for it, too.
> If you opt to continue using Visual Studio 6 in
> spite of this, it must have some important red
Hi:
Using CVS 1.11.17 running as a pserver on UNIX AIX 5.1 we had a core dump of
the CVS server when accessing with wincvs 1.3. Here is a core dump showing the
routine causing the segmentation fault. We have not had a problem with the
most recent version of tortoise but wincvs seems to be hav
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim.Hyslop wrote:
| Jim Meyering wrote:
|
|> Is it an option to use a more modern/POSIX-compliant development
|> environment on Windows? I know that Cygwin now has fchdir and it
|> looks like MKS has support for it, too.
|
|
|> If you opt to continue u
[CVS support for MSVC]
By the way, I just had a quick look at Visual Studio .NET 2003, and it does
not appear to have POSIX support. At least, there's not fchdir function,
which is what triggered this whole discussion ;=)
--
Jim Hyslop
Senior Software Designer
Leitch Technology International Inc
On Tuesday 08 March 2005 16:37, Derek Price wrote:
> Jim.Hyslop wrote:
> | Jim Meyering wrote:
> |> Is it an option to use a more modern/POSIX-compliant development
> |> environment on Windows? I know that Cygwin now has fchdir and it
> |> looks like MKS has support for it, too.
> |>
> |>
> |> If
Derek Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm afraid I have to agree with Jim Hyslop. Whatever Microsoft's
> flaws, I still believe that some of our mutual user base is at least
> relatively innocent and should still be catered to.
This is not about Microsoft per se, but simply about
the lack of f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Meyering wrote:
| Derek Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
|> I'm afraid I have to agree with Jim Hyslop. Whatever Microsoft's
|> flaws, I still believe that some of our mutual user base is at
|> least relatively innocent and should still be cater
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Larry Jones wrote:
| Andrew Morton writes:
|
|> On a dual 2.7GHz power4, the cvs client has racked up an hour of
|> CPU time so far. There's something in there which is quadratic
|> (or worse) in the number of files in a directory.
|
|
| Yes, the fix f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Derek,
> From: Derek Price [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I've attached the diff. Conrad or somebody, would you mind verifying
> that after applying this patch (on WOE32, only the two named files will
> be relevant)...
Please define the phrase
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The build process on Solaris 8 Intel Edition seems
to generate "lib/stdint.h" as an intermediate build
product.
Is there any objection to adding "stdint.h" to the
"lib/.cvsignore" file?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 7.0.4
iQA/AwUBQi39
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Conrad T. Pino wrote:
| The build process on Solaris 8 Intel Edition seems to generate
| "lib/stdint.h" as an intermediate build product.
|
| Is there any objection to adding "stdint.h" to the "lib/.cvsignore"
| file?
None whatsoever. :)
Regards,
Dere
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Any further thoughts on this patch?
| 2005-03-04 Derek R. Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
| * lib/wait-process.h (wait_subprocess): Accept a new exitsignal
| argument. * lib/wait-process.c (wait_subprocess): Always set
| *exitsignal to 0 when present and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Conrad T. Pino wrote:
|
| Hi Derek,
|
|> From: Derek Price [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
|> I've attached the diff. Conrad or somebody, would you mind
|> verifying that after applying this patch (on WOE32, only the two
|> named files will be relevant)...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Derek,
> From: Derek Price [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> The two files are listed in the subject line. :)
Oops, I need another cup of coffee!! :)
> First off, the problem cited in your output is not caused by the patch
> I just sent, but I'll
Derek Price wrote:
> Actually moving the code would be complicated and not symetrical. I
> dislike having a process responsible for disposing of temporary data it
> did not create.
>
> In the CVS client/server architecture, there are two servers. The first
> authenticates the client and interpret
Here is a more detailed description of the tag-extensions:
Terminologie:
Following the mainline (backwards):
Starting from a specific rev. number X on the trunk or a branch, the line is
followed backwards up to the first revision Z on the trunk. It doesn't matter
if there are dead or missing revi
17 matches
Mail list logo
