but I am sure that it can
read from cvs' stdout instead of stderr, too.
Yes, it *could*. But at the moment it expects this particular input from
stderr and all (?) other versions of CVS servers send it at stderr.
There are already too much differences between GNU CVS and CVSNT...
Wouldn't it be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Just to prevent an out-of-the-brain change: if they would we sent to
> stdout, this would break at least SmartCVS.
>
I don't want to break your GUI, but I am sure that it can
read from cvs' stdout instead of stderr, too.
Wouldn't it be more consistent to reserve stderr
