Re: windows-NT/mkconfig.pl & windows-NT/fix-msvc-mak.pl change

2005-03-09 Thread Derek Price
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Conrad T. Pino wrote: | Previously I wasn't aware of the existence of the intermediates on | UNIX and of course they don't exist on Windows. The commands I ran | on both Windows and UNIX are: | | cd ccvs perl windows-NT/fix-msvc-mak.pl cd windows-NT p

RE: windows-NT/mkconfig.pl & windows-NT/fix-msvc-mak.pl change

2005-03-09 Thread Conrad T. Pino
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Derek, I'm slow to understand the goal. I'm coming to the conclusion what you're trying is eliminate the difference between: *** config.h.in, generated by mkconfig: as opposed to: *** config.h.in, generated by mkconfig.pl:

RE: windows-NT/mkconfig.pl & windows-NT/fix-msvc-mak.pl change

2005-03-08 Thread Conrad T. Pino
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Derek, > From: Derek Price [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > The two files are listed in the subject line. :) Oops, I need another cup of coffee!! :) > First off, the problem cited in your output is not caused by the patch > I just sent, but I'll

Re: windows-NT/mkconfig.pl & windows-NT/fix-msvc-mak.pl change

2005-03-08 Thread Derek Price
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Conrad T. Pino wrote: | | Hi Derek, | |> From: Derek Price [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | |> I've attached the diff. Conrad or somebody, would you mind |> verifying that after applying this patch (on WOE32, only the two |> named files will be relevant)...

RE: windows-NT/mkconfig.pl & windows-NT/fix-msvc-mak.pl change

2005-03-08 Thread Conrad T. Pino
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Derek, > From: Derek Price [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I've attached the diff. Conrad or somebody, would you mind verifying > that after applying this patch (on WOE32, only the two named files will > be relevant)... Please define the phrase