A problem internal to GDB has been detected,
further debugging may prove unreliable.
when run on i686 GNU/Linux with recent sources:
GNU gdb 6.6.50.20070307-cvs
Program compiled with GCC 4.1.2 derivate.
Paul Hilfinger
-foo.c---
Try anonymous ftp from cs.nyu.edu, in the pub/gnat/3.13p
directory. The gdb patch (on gdb 4.17) is included in the file
gnat-3.13p-src.tgz.
> I found gnu do launch new ada patch for gdb. I've
> seen gdb-4.17.gnat.3.12p. But I've got only
> executable file on alpha platform, no source file
hen addresses DO
change. Pardon my ignorance of shared library internals in general,
but SHOULD these symbol tables be reloaded in the absence of change to
the executable?
Anyway, comments appreciated.
Paul Hilfinger
___
Bug-gdb mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gdb
Some months ago, I asked about the status of GDB5 on 64-bit Solaris
host/target combinations. I interpreted the reply as "it works,
doesn't it?" It seems not to, but the behavior I get is such an
immediate show-stopper that it makes me believe that the problem must
be extremely sensitive to con
ed.
Mind you, various annoyances have prevented me from getting a version
that actually DOES work yet on Solaris, and I can't vouch for all
releases of Solaris (this info is from a 2.7 version of the OS).
However, this at least indicates one problem one might face.
Paul Hilfi
