Hi Andrew,
> Something that has been kicking around the GDB list but is really a
> BFD problem. Anyone want to grab this and run with it? I don't
> know enough about core dumps to do the job myself.
Sadly neither do I. The patch however looks wrong to me. With the
patch applied, the code lo
> I can see why you would want to preserve the signal, but shouldn't you
> also preserve the PID (and any other core related data) as well ? In
> fact isn't this really a multithreading problem, with a single BFD
> structure being used to represent multiple (potential) thread cores ?
It wouldn't
Hi Peter,
> > I can see why you would want to preserve the signal, but shouldn't you
> > also preserve the PID (and any other core related data) as well ? In
> > fact isn't this really a multithreading problem, with a single BFD
> > structure being used to represent multiple (potential) thread c
