Hello,
Here is an additional patch that takes care of a new warning:
./gdb.texinfo:31: warning: @syncodeindex leads to a merging of fn in itself,
ignoring
It simply comments out the line
@syncodeindex fn fn
which is a bit weird.
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 10:37:53PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 05:52:55AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> > ./gdb.texinfo:22939: warning: @table has text but no @item
>
> Why is this warning needed?
To do what you wanted to do with that construct, that is an indented
environment without anything else special, we added @indentedblock
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 03:49:11PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > That's true, but an asterisk '*' cannot be a valid label,
> >
> > I can't see why.
>
> Because of "* Menu".
I still don't get it. It seems to me that
@menu
* *: mynode.
@end menu
is a perfectly valid menu entry, and same w
> Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 22:39:58 +0200
> From: Patrice Dumas
> Cc: bug-gdb@gnu.org, k...@freefriends.org
>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 05:52:55AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >
> > > ./gdb.texinfo:190: warning: @contents should only appear at beginning or
> > > end of document
>
> This warning
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 05:52:55AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> > ./gdb.texinfo:190: warning: @contents should only appear at beginning or
> > end of document
This warning is no longer there, it was not clearly wrong in formats
other than TeX, and we don't want to have something specific for
> Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 15:07:38 +0200
> From: Patrice Dumas
> Cc: bug-gdb@gnu.org, k...@freefriends.org
>
> You missed my point. The manual is formatted fine, but since it uses an
> undocummented Texinfo feature it is in a bad shape Texinfo-wise and the
> formatting could change in the future,
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:51:16PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> That demand would be satisfied by an optional warning. E.g., like
> with GCC's -Wfoo switches.
>
> > As to whether this means that the manual is in bad shape, I would be
> > tempted to say that it is the case.
>
> Here's the out
> Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 13:29:38 +0200
> From: Patrice Dumas
> Cc: bug-gdb@gnu.org, k...@freefriends.org
>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:54:15PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't think so. If I am not wrong, a colon means that there is a label
> > > before the node name, but it s
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:54:15PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >
> > I don't think so. If I am not wrong, a colon means that there is a label
> > before the node name, but it still leads to a cross reference.
>
> That's true, but an asterisk '*' cannot be a valid label,
I can't see why.
>
> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 19:24:51 +0200
> From: Patrice Dumas
> Cc: bug-gdb@gnu.org, k...@freefriends.org
>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 07:17:40PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > > > ./gdb.texinfo:11503: warning: @strong{Note...} produces a spurious
> > > > > cross-reference in Info
> > > >
> >
> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 19:18:19 +0200
> From: Patrice Dumas
> Cc: bug-gdb@gnu.org, k...@freefriends.org
>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 07:15:47PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 05:52:55AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > ./gdb.texinfo:22939: warning: @table
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 07:17:40PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > > ./gdb.texinfo:11503: warning: @strong{Note...} produces a spurious
> > > > cross-reference in Info
> > >
> > > No, it doesn't, not with a colon immediately following the "Note".
> >
> > My testing shows that it indeed does, a
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 07:15:47PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 05:52:55AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > >
> > > > ./gdb.texinfo:22939: warning: @table has text but no @item
> > >
> > > Why is this warning needed?
> >
> > This one is clear to me. A @table without @i
> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 15:58:57 +0200
> From: Patrice Dumas
> Cc: bug-gdb@gnu.org, k...@freefriends.org
>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 05:56:49AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 22:37:53 +0200
> > > From: Patrice Dumas
> > > Cc: Karl Berry
> > >
> > > ./gdb.texinfo:1150
> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 15:50:29 +0200
> From: Patrice Dumas
> Cc: bug-gdb@gnu.org, k...@freefriends.org
>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 05:52:55AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >
> > > ./gdb.texinfo:22939: warning: @table has text but no @item
> >
> > Why is this warning needed?
>
> This one is
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 05:56:49AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 22:37:53 +0200
> > From: Patrice Dumas
> > Cc: Karl Berry
> >
> > ./gdb.texinfo:11503: warning: @strong{Note...} produces a spurious
> > cross-reference in Info
>
> No, it doesn't, not with a colon immedi
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 05:52:55AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> > ./gdb.texinfo:22939: warning: @table has text but no @item
>
> Why is this warning needed?
This one is clear to me. A @table without @item does not make sense. A
@table specifies a series of headings and associated texts, so
> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 22:37:53 +0200
> From: Patrice Dumas
> Cc: Karl Berry
>
> ./gdb.texinfo:11503: warning: @strong{Note...} produces a spurious
> cross-reference in Info
No, it doesn't, not with a colon immediately following the "Note".
___
bu
> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 22:37:53 +0200
> From: Patrice Dumas
> Cc: Karl Berry
>
> The following warnings remain when using the cvs makeinfo version. It
> is unclear to me how to solve these, but hipefully, you should be able
> to fix them, or bear with warnings:
Thanks, but...
> ./gdb.texinf
19 matches
Mail list logo
