Hello,
The following warnings remain when using the cvs makeinfo version. It
is unclear to me how to solve these, but hipefully, you should be able
to fix them, or bear with warnings:
./gdb.texinfo:22939: warning: @table has text but no @item
./gdb.texinfo:22991: warning: @table has text but no
> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 22:37:53 +0200
> From: Patrice Dumas
> Cc: Karl Berry
>
> The following warnings remain when using the cvs makeinfo version. It
> is unclear to me how to solve these, but hipefully, you should be able
> to fix them, or bear with warnings:
Thanks, but...
> ./gdb.texinf
> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 22:37:53 +0200
> From: Patrice Dumas
> Cc: Karl Berry
>
> ./gdb.texinfo:11503: warning: @strong{Note...} produces a spurious
> cross-reference in Info
No, it doesn't, not with a colon immediately following the "Note".
___
bu
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 05:52:55AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> > ./gdb.texinfo:22939: warning: @table has text but no @item
>
> Why is this warning needed?
This one is clear to me. A @table without @item does not make sense. A
@table specifies a series of headings and associated texts, so
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 05:56:49AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 22:37:53 +0200
> > From: Patrice Dumas
> > Cc: Karl Berry
> >
> > ./gdb.texinfo:11503: warning: @strong{Note...} produces a spurious
> > cross-reference in Info
>
> No, it doesn't, not with a colon immedi
> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 15:50:29 +0200
> From: Patrice Dumas
> Cc: bug-gdb@gnu.org, k...@freefriends.org
>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 05:52:55AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >
> > > ./gdb.texinfo:22939: warning: @table has text but no @item
> >
> > Why is this warning needed?
>
> This one is
> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 15:58:57 +0200
> From: Patrice Dumas
> Cc: bug-gdb@gnu.org, k...@freefriends.org
>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 05:56:49AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 22:37:53 +0200
> > > From: Patrice Dumas
> > > Cc: Karl Berry
> > >
> > > ./gdb.texinfo:1150
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 07:15:47PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 05:52:55AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > >
> > > > ./gdb.texinfo:22939: warning: @table has text but no @item
> > >
> > > Why is this warning needed?
> >
> > This one is clear to me. A @table without @i
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 07:17:40PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > > ./gdb.texinfo:11503: warning: @strong{Note...} produces a spurious
> > > > cross-reference in Info
> > >
> > > No, it doesn't, not with a colon immediately following the "Note".
> >
> > My testing shows that it indeed does, a
> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 19:18:19 +0200
> From: Patrice Dumas
> Cc: bug-gdb@gnu.org, k...@freefriends.org
>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 07:15:47PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 05:52:55AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > ./gdb.texinfo:22939: warning: @table
> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 19:24:51 +0200
> From: Patrice Dumas
> Cc: bug-gdb@gnu.org, k...@freefriends.org
>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 07:17:40PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > > > ./gdb.texinfo:11503: warning: @strong{Note...} produces a spurious
> > > > > cross-reference in Info
> > > >
> >
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:54:15PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >
> > I don't think so. If I am not wrong, a colon means that there is a label
> > before the node name, but it still leads to a cross reference.
>
> That's true, but an asterisk '*' cannot be a valid label,
I can't see why.
>
> Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 13:29:38 +0200
> From: Patrice Dumas
> Cc: bug-gdb@gnu.org, k...@freefriends.org
>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:54:15PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't think so. If I am not wrong, a colon means that there is a label
> > > before the node name, but it s
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:51:16PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> That demand would be satisfied by an optional warning. E.g., like
> with GCC's -Wfoo switches.
>
> > As to whether this means that the manual is in bad shape, I would be
> > tempted to say that it is the case.
>
> Here's the out
> Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 15:07:38 +0200
> From: Patrice Dumas
> Cc: bug-gdb@gnu.org, k...@freefriends.org
>
> You missed my point. The manual is formatted fine, but since it uses an
> undocummented Texinfo feature it is in a bad shape Texinfo-wise and the
> formatting could change in the future,
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 05:52:55AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> > ./gdb.texinfo:190: warning: @contents should only appear at beginning or
> > end of document
This warning is no longer there, it was not clearly wrong in formats
other than TeX, and we don't want to have something specific for
> Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 22:39:58 +0200
> From: Patrice Dumas
> Cc: bug-gdb@gnu.org, k...@freefriends.org
>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 05:52:55AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >
> > > ./gdb.texinfo:190: warning: @contents should only appear at beginning or
> > > end of document
>
> This warning
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 03:49:11PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > That's true, but an asterisk '*' cannot be a valid label,
> >
> > I can't see why.
>
> Because of "* Menu".
I still don't get it. It seems to me that
@menu
* *: mynode.
@end menu
is a perfectly valid menu entry, and same w
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 05:52:55AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> > ./gdb.texinfo:22939: warning: @table has text but no @item
>
> Why is this warning needed?
To do what you wanted to do with that construct, that is an indented
environment without anything else special, we added @indentedblock
Hello,
Here is an additional patch that takes care of a new warning:
./gdb.texinfo:31: warning: @syncodeindex leads to a merging of fn in itself,
ignoring
It simply comments out the line
@syncodeindex fn fn
which is a bit weird.
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 10:37:53PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
20 matches
Mail list logo
