Hi Achim,
I gave it a quick try (fedora 6) but had a couple of problems:
a) the link to your public gpg key is broken. Found it by searching,
but it wasn't readily importable by rpm when used directly by
copy/paste.
b) the snapshot database file is much smaller than the 0.15 one and
gnubg later
I made some new packages.
* Christian Anthon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070604 10:55]:
> Hi Achim,
>
> I gave it a quick try (fedora 6) but had a couple of problems:
>
> a) the link to your public gpg key is broken. Found it by searching,
> but it wasn't readily importable by rpm when used directly by
It seems that the provided version doesn't include python, though I'm
not sure as to why it would load the python startup script then.
Christian.
___
Bug-gnubg mailing list
Bug-gnubg@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
* Christian Anthon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070604 15:23]:
> It seems that the provided version doesn't include python, though I'm
> not sure as to why it would load the python startup script then.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ /usr/bin/gnubg -t
GNU Backgammon 0.16-devel
Copyright 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003
...
Thou shalt not speak of "Linux"
Thou shalt not speak of "Win"
Those names art just like eunuchs
And nothing but a sin.
Thou shalt always mention "GNU"
Thou shalt ever honour "GPL"
Thine web page hath to change soon
Else rot will thou in hell
And perils of my curses
Will fall upon all you.
S
LOL,
I seriously wonder when RMS stopped having fun. He may be right and
perhaps even justified, but stuff like this just alienates people who
support the GNU idea.
Christian.
On 6/4/07, Achim Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
Thou shalt not speak of "Linux"
Thou shalt not speak of "Win"
Perhaps. However I can see GNUbg coming to life without Linux. I can't
see it happening without GNU. Think gcc, emacs, python, gtk and so on.
I think Stallman deserves the credit and we owe it to him, especially
if he cares about it.
On 6/5/07, Christian Anthon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
LOL,
I
debug, edlin, dos batch files, direct video access to the text frame buffer.
GnuBG could have existed without GNU ;-)
On 6/4/07 4:20 PM, "Joseph Heled" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps. However I can see GNUbg coming to life without Linux. I can't
> see it happening without GNU. Think gcc, e
On 6/5/07, Michael Petch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
debug, edlin, dos batch files, direct video access to the text frame buffer.
GnuBG could have existed without GNU ;-)
Humor aside, Yes, it would have existed, but I doubt it very much you
would want to use it, at a rating of 1640 or so.
I don
I'm not saying that we don't owe the GNU tools a lot (and I think you
are even missing the most basic one, the GPL), I'm just saying I feel
that he does the GNU cause a disservice with this militaristic
nitpicking.
Christian.
___
Bug-gnubg mailing lis
10 matches
Mail list logo
