[Bug-gnubg] RE: Bug-gnubg Digest, Vol 57, Issue 6

2007-08-22 Thread bob koca
> Robert-Jan> > In money games, one can expect from doubling theory that with > perfect play,> 2/3 of initial doubles are takes (for redoubles, it is 1/2). > Simulations> with GNUBG 2-ply playing against itself indeed get very close to > this> number.> Do your 2/3 and 1/2 figures come from

Re: Not quite {was: Re: [Bug-gnubg] Double Decisions

2007-08-22 Thread Roy A. Crabtree
You are missing the points I am raising almost enitely; I will have to repsond in detail later, time pressure s on other track. You need to learn that a program does what it does independent of what anyone THINKS about ot doing, and oftimes the conceptions ina programmer's head simply do NOT fit w

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Double Decisions

2007-08-22 Thread Robert-Jan Veldhuizen
On 8/22/07, Peter Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I dont really have any precise data. It's more of a feeling. Obviously > if gnu thinks it is in a losing position it wont offer a double. I > guess what my main point was that once gnu offers, if you press hint, > the hint will > 75% of th

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Double Decisions

2007-08-22 Thread Achim Mueller
* Peter Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070822 15:23]: > I dont really have any precise data. It's more of a feeling. Obviously if > gnu thinks it is in a losing position it wont offer a > double. I guess what my main point was that once gnu offers, if you press > hint, the hint will > 75% of th

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Double Decisions

2007-08-22 Thread Peter Carlson
I dont really have any precise data. It's more of a feeling. Obviously if gnu thinks it is in a losing position it wont offer a double. I guess what my main point was that once gnu offers, if you press hint, the hint will > 75% of the time - based upon actual game playing - advise you to tak

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Edit name bug ?

2007-08-22 Thread Christian Anthon
And it is in 0.15 too, so probably been like that forever. Funny nobody noticed. Christian. On 8/22/07, Massimiliano Maini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote on 22/08/2007 13:59:39: > > > * Massimiliano Maini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070822 12:53]: > > > Hi all, > > > > > >

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Edit name bug ?

2007-08-22 Thread Massimiliano Maini
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 22/08/2007 13:59:39: > * Massimiliano Maini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070822 12:53]: > > Hi all, > > > > GnuBG Win, code source 20070731, GUI version: start a match/session, enter > > edit mode > > and alter the names of both players. Exit edit mode, just one name is > >

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Edit name bug ?

2007-08-22 Thread Achim Mueller
* Massimiliano Maini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070822 12:53]: > Hi all, > > GnuBG Win, code source 20070731, GUI version: start a match/session, enter > edit mode > and alter the names of both players. Exit edit mode, just one name is > updated (leftmost). Confirmed on a linux system. Can you put it

[Bug-gnubg] Edit name bug ?

2007-08-22 Thread Massimiliano Maini
Hi all, GnuBG Win, code source 20070731, GUI version: start a match/session, enter edit mode and alter the names of both players. Exit edit mode, just one name is updated (leftmost). MaX.___ Bug-gnubg mailing list Bug-gnubg@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.or

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Double Decisions

2007-08-22 Thread Joseph Heled
On 8/20/07, Peter Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why does gnu *almost* always recommend to take a double. I have noticed > after playing literally hundreds of games against gnu that 99% of the > time it recommends to take a double it is just plain WRONG! besides why > would gnu offer a doub