Re: [Bug-gnubg] Package for MacOS

2008-05-10 Thread Michael Petch
On 5/9/08 11:44 PM, Achim Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm planning to make packages for MacOS 10.5 now. This is easier said than done - depending on how you intend to Package things. Unlike most distributions, MAC OSX and DarwinPorts - All the library paths are hard coded. Yeppers! You

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Package for MacOS

2008-05-10 Thread Michael Petch
On 5/10/08 12:22 AM, Michael Petch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is possible, and I have done it with Darwin Ports but it requires doing BINARY replacement of the /opt paths and make them all relative paths. I meant to say: This is possible, and I have done it with Darwin Ports but it

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Package for MacOS

2008-05-10 Thread Achim Mueller
Am 10.05.2008 um 08:22 schrieb Michael Petch: On 5/9/08 11:44 PM, Achim Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm planning to make packages for MacOS 10.5 now. This is easier said than done - depending on how you intend to Package things. Wel, it might be that I'm a bit naive, but I have

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Package for MacOS

2008-05-10 Thread Michael Petch
On 5/10/08 7:33 AM, Achim Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wel, it might be that I'm a bit naive, but I have a software called dropdmg, and according to the description I only have to drop all necessary files into a container, point to a license, sign the package and that's all. I have