I can provide a place for the download until the ftp on gnubg.org gets sorted.
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:56 PM, Michael Petch wrote:
>
>
> On 19/08/09 3:45 PM, "Massimiliano Maini" wrote:
>
>> I would say that the only truly major issue is the one reported by Matt
>> from bgonline (money eval sc
On 19/08/09 3:45 PM, "Massimiliano Maini" wrote:
> I would say that the only truly major issue is the one reported by Matt
> from bgonline (money eval screwed with/without jacoby).
>
There is one other serious error that arose while you were gone. There is a
bug with optimizations and the Prun
).
But I can mail them personally if you
want. Let me know.
MaX.
- Message d'origine
> De : Michael Petch
> À : Michael Petch
> Cc : Massimiliano Maini ; "bug-gnubg@gnu.org"
>
> Envoyé le : Mercredi, 19 Août 2009, 21h55mn 59s
> Objet : Re: Re : Re
On 19/08/09 3:03 PM, "Christian Anthon" wrote:
> The warnings in the cl version are non-fatal, so they shouldn't hold
> back a new build, right?
>
Correct, they are non fatal, and works the same as the previous July windows
builds. I would prefer to see it built as is for now, and worry about
The warnings in the cl version are non-fatal, so they shouldn't hold
back a new build, right?
Christian.
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Michael Petch wrote:
>
> I have had numerous inquiries as to when the Pruning/Optimization bug will
> be fixed. It's the primary driving force to see if Max ca
I have had numerous inquiries as to when the Pruning/Optimization bug will
be fixed. It's the primary driving force to see if Max can get a release
done for us (I'd love to test a build if he has one done, even if it is the
GUI).
Max do you have an executable (GUI version) I can download (Just th
On 19/08/09 1:36 PM, "Christian Anthon" wrote:
> Windows executables have a special flag set requiring the command line
> background (or not). I believe that is the motivation for doing things
> differently. Windows users are apparently not comfortable with having
> the command line window hangi
The best and easiest solution is to make a gui.rc for the gui settings.
Christian.
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Massimiliano Maini wrote:
> Clicked on send way too fast sorry.
>
> I get this:
>
>
> GNU Backgammon 0.90-mingw 20090817gcc44
> Copyright (C) 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Michael Petch wrote:
> unknown keywords to stdout.
>
> @@ -1264,10 +1252,7 @@
> break;
>
> if( !pc->sz ) {
> - outputf( _("Unknown keyword `%s'."), pch );
> - output("\n");
> -
> - outputx();
> + outputerrf( _("Unknown keyword `%s'.\n"), pch
On 19/08/09 1:06 PM, "Michael Petch" wrote:
> in main(). If someone can experiment, what happens if it is modified to
> this:
>
> #ifdef WIN32
> fNoTTY = FALSE;
> #endif
Possibly it might have to be changed to:
in main(). If someone can experiment, what happens if it is modified to
thi
On 19/08/09 9:35 AM, "Massimiliano Maini" wrote:
> One strange thing I've found (or that I've never noticed). If you do an "help
> set"
> in the CLI, you get this:
>
> and when I start the CLI on it I see this:
>
> Unknown keyword `annotation'.
> Unknown keyword `message'..
> Unknown keywor
uot;visible" in CLI (proff by "help set")
even if they
make sense only in GUI exe.
In commands.inc some commands are in #if USE_GTK ...
Removing all the #if USE_GTK in command.inc would probably solve the warning
issue,
but not the pfact that savingfrom CLI will lose GUI settings and
I've got a feeling that these warnings were hidden in older versions, probably
something to do with changes to how messages are shown.
If you save the settings from a command line build you loose all the gui
settings... This area needs a bit of an overhaul I think, the whole needing to
save any
On 18/08/09 8:52 AM, "Massimiliano Maini" wrote:
> I don't remeber this in the past ...
>
> Much in favor of option B here.
>
It wasn't a problem with the MingW builds from the 0.15 time frame. I'll
look into it.
___
Bug-gnubg mailing list
Bug-g
On 18/08/09 8:52 AM, "Massimiliano Maini" wrote:
> I don't remeber this in the past ...
>
> Much in favor of option B here.
>
It happens on older ones as far as I can remember (At least in the past
year). The current version from 0625 that I have installed does the same (I
just tried it), it
I don't remeber this in the past ...
Much in favor of option B here.
MaX.
- Message d'origine
> De : Michael Petch
> À : Massimiliano Maini ; "bug-gnubg@gnu.org"
>
> Envoyé le : Mardi, 18 Août 2009, 16h31mn 58s
> Objet : Re: [Bug-gnubg] Tr : No-g
On 18/08/09 6:48 AM, "Massimiliano Maini" wrote:
> Clicked on send way too fast sorry.
>
> I get this:
>
[snip]
Same issue as the limit command but for a different reason A9nd this issue
aAFAIK has been around for ages). If you run the GUI version gnubgautorc all
the GUI features are not
17 matches
Mail list logo
