On 1/18/2024 2:22 PM, MK wrote:
On 1/18/2024 6:31 AM, Ian Shaw wrote:
You can’t make the gnubg engine only be itself
for some moves, and ask you to make the choices
for other moves.
There is no reason for this arbitrary, unnecessary
limitation. Bot can wait to roll and/or move until
it's
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 02:08:23PM +, Ian Shaw via Bug reports for and
general discussion about GNU Backgammon. wrote:
> The file file.c has a function GetFilename which includes the line
>
> if (mi.nYear)
> sz = g_strdup_printf("%s-%s_%dp_%04u-%02u-%02u.sgf",
>
On 1/18/2024 6:31 AM, Ian Shaw wrote:
The code doesn’t "/make an exception for the bot/".
The bot already ALWAYS automatically decides whether
to roll or move. The exceptions are for the human,
to speed up our play when the decision is trivial.
... the human allowed to make their own move,
>
> FA >> (Whose error rate? Both?).
>
Hi Francesco,
Sorry - was your question serious?
I think naturally, the vast majority of the audience are interested in
gathering insights into *their own* error rates, rather than a robot's.
I'm sure we are all aware that robots play robotically and
Another great contribution Philippe!
Confirmed working on one of my machines:
Edition Windows 11 Home
Version 23H2
OS build 22631.3007
Experience Windows Feature Experience Pack 1000.22681.1000.0
Processor 11th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-1135G7 @ 2.40GHz 2.42 GHz
Installed RAM 16.0 GB (15.8 GB
The file file.c has a function GetFilename which includes the line
if (mi.nYear)
sz = g_strdup_printf("%s-%s_%dp_%04u-%02u-%02u.sgf", ap[0].szName,
ap[1].szName, ms. nMatchTo, mi.nYear, mi.nMonth, mi.nDay);
I couldn’t find where mi is set, but if it includes the parameters
Hi Murat,
The code doesn’t "make an exception for the bot". The bot already ALWAYS
automatically decides whether to roll or move. The exceptions are for the
human, to speed up our play when the decision is trivial. The human is allowed
to roll, EXCEPT if the auto roll is checked and he
Hello Joseph,
Il 18 gennaio 2024 alle 11:33 Wayne Joseph ha scritto:
> To propose a relatively 'easy' solution to this, I think it would make
> better sense to add an hour-minute timestamp to the existing file name
> convention?
>
> [snip]
>
> In addition, for a cherry on top, it would be even
Is the way gnubg names files something that just I find sub-optimal, or is
it fine for everybody else?
I imagine like many of us, some days, I will play multiple matches (5-10)
against gnubg backgammon. I like to analyse and save each of them afterwards
When I click save, by default, it auto
