HI
Am I able to import a file of a position, match score etc and you would
return the XG analysis to me?
Of course I don't assume that gnubg always wins. That would be naive.
A cube strategy against a bot that never passes: only double when (a) you are
100% to win (b) it's the last roll of the game and you have an advantage. The
bot can also take a double deeper than normal, since the mutant will
Yes, I am referring to theoretical continuous model for the 20% value, and
agree it would apply to any suitable game, not just backgammon.
But backgammon isn't a continuous game. It has jumps in equity betewen one
opportunity to double and the next.
The concept of cube efficiency is the
On 3/31/2024 4:18 AM, Ian Shaw wrote:
If the mutant strategy is always to take, then gnubg GAINS when > Mutant takes
a D/P because that increases the points GnuBg wins.
Yes, of course, but only and only if the GnuBG wins. Obviously you
faithfully assume that GnuBG will always win and keep
On 3/31/2024 3:53 AM, Ian Shaw wrote:
I'm glad we agree on the basic 25% take point. Do you also agree on
the the theoretical 20% take point for perfect cube efficiency?
If by "theoretical" you mean a purely mathematical proposition, i.e.
not specifically related to cubeful backgammon,
