Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Is there a preference for 'const char *' over 'char const *'? > > I prefer putting type qualifiers like "const" after the types they > modify, as that's more consistent. For example, "char * const *" puts
As you've probably noticed, I too prefer that. For the same reason: syntactic consistency. _______________________________________________ bug-gnulib mailing list bug-gnulib@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnulib
