Hi Bruno.
On Sat, 1 Aug 2009, Bruno Haible wrote:
> > Would anyone object to my mass-updating all
> > FSF-copyright year lists in gnulib to include 2009?
> > (of course, I'd exclude files that are still
> > in sync with originals elsewhere)
>
> No objection on principle, from me. The 'update-cop
Jim Meyering wrote:
> Updating copyright year lists piecemeal is tiresome and unnecessary, now.
>
> http://marc.info/?l=coreutils-bug&m=124788185110393&w=2
Hey, since 2006 already!
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=gnulib.git;a=commitdiff;h=2a577fa2027dc966eadcdd71a9b5f6e699f89165
Such a
Bruno Haible wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>> I've pushed them, after adding a ChangeLog entry to each.
>
> And I've updated the copyright years accordingly:
Updating copyright year lists piecemeal is tiresome and unnecessary, now.
http://marc.info/?l=coreutils-bug&m=124788185110393&w=2
Would
Peter Simons wrote:
> The original version required a very specific spelling of the line:
>
> old_NEWS_hash = foobar
>
> In particular, it didn't allow for \t to be used instead of blanks, and
> it didn't recognize the simply-expanded assignment operator ':='.
> ---
> top/maint.mk |2 +-
> 1
The original version required a very specific spelling of the line:
old_NEWS_hash = foobar
In particular, it didn't allow for \t to be used instead of blanks, and
it didn't recognize the simply-expanded assignment operator ':='.
---
top/maint.mk |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 d
Jim Meyering wrote:
> I've pushed them, after adding a ChangeLog entry to each.
And I've updated the copyright years accordingly:
--- lib/md2.h.orig 2009-08-01 11:24:43.0 +0200
+++ lib/md2.h 2009-08-01 11:23:39.0 +0200
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
/* Declarations of functions and data
Hi Jim,
> Without this change, updating coreutils to use latest gnulib
> resulted in link errors due to lack of definition of rpl_mktime
> on systems like gnu/linux for which the replacement is not used.
...
> --- a/m4/mktime.m4
> +++ b/m4/mktime.m4
> @@ -221,6 +221,8 @@ AC_DEFUN([gl_FUNC_MKTIME],
