Re: install-reloc is invoked with too many arguments

2012-05-03 Thread Sylvain
Hi, On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 01:47:06PM +0200, Sylvain wrote: > On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 12:43:48PM +0200, Sylvain wrote: > I tested the fix under Debian/Hurd. AFAICS it works :) > > I'll upload a new Debian version of FreeDink with the updated > install-reloc so we'll see if the autobuilders agre

Re: cross-compilation guesses (6)

2012-05-03 Thread Bruno Haible
> 2012-05-01 Bruno Haible > > lstat: Avoid "guessing no" when cross-compiling to glibc systems. > * m4/lstat.m4 (gl_FUNC_LSTAT_FOLLOWS_SLASHED_SYMLINK): When cross- > compiling, set gl_cv_func_lstat_dereferences_slashed_symlink to > "guessing yes" or "guessing no". >

Re: cross-compilation guesses (5)

2012-05-03 Thread Bruno Haible
Eric Blake wrote: > Can we add other known-good systems, like Cygwin? But that can be an > incremental improvement in a later patch. OK, done in the patch for Autoconf. The patch for gnulib is simpler now: 2012-05-03 Bruno Haible *alloc-gnu, eealloc: Avoid "guessing no" when cross-c

Re: cross-compilation guesses (4)

2012-05-03 Thread Bruno Haible
Eric Blake wrote: > Patches for existing autoconf macros to make smarter guesses would be > welcome, in my mind. Thanks for applying the patch so quickly. It simplifies the logic of the change in gnulib: 2012-05-03 Bruno Haible getgroups: Avoid "guessing no" when cross-compiling to g

Re: cross-compilation guesses (3)

2012-05-03 Thread Bruno Haible
Paul Eggert wrote: > I would think that a patch would be welcome for Autoconf, > just as it is for gnulib -- we like to support GNU systems > well. Thanks for the advice. Now that the patch has been accepted in Autoconf, it's more straightforward to override AC_FUNC_CHOWN in Autoconf < 2.70. I'm a

Re: cross-compilation guesses (5)

2012-05-03 Thread Jim Meyering
Bruno Haible wrote: > Jim Meyering wrote: >> However, I would find the above code easier to read if it were >> written on fewer lines: >> >> case "$host_os" in >> *-gnu*) $1 ;; # Guess yes on glibc systems. >> *) $2 ;; # If we don't know, assume the worst. >> esac > > Will