Hi,
Am 08.05.2012 um 23:17 schrieb Paul Eggert:
> On 05/08/2012 01:05 PM, Niels Möller wrote:
>> I think it should work fine to just get the gnutls release and apply
>> Paul's patch to the file gnutls-3.0.9/gl/stdint.in.h before running the
>> configure script.
>
> Yes, that's the idea. Thanks.
Paul Eggert writes:
> On 05/22/2012 05:45 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> I wonder if the 'extensions' module should add a -U_POSIX_SOURCE to
>> CFLAGS on platforms where defining _POSIX_SOURCE is known to disable
>> useful extensions.
>
> Typically it's not a good idea to second-guess users if they exp
On 05/22/2012 05:45 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> I wonder if the 'extensions' module should add a -U_POSIX_SOURCE to
> CFLAGS on platforms where defining _POSIX_SOURCE is known to disable
> useful extensions.
Typically it's not a good idea to second-guess users if they explicitly
put something into CFL
Hello,
Since May 9 my gnulib daily build running on CentOS 5 has failed to
complete like this:
gcc -std=gnu99 -g -O2 -Wall -o test-system-quote-child
test-system-quote-child.o -lm -lm -lm -lm -lm -lm -lm -lm -lm -lm -lm
test-system-quote-child.o: In function `main':
/home/tgc/projects/gn
Akim Demaille wrote:
> Le 22 mai 2012 à 11:42, Jim Meyering a écrit :
>
>> Hi Akim,
>
> Hi!
>
>>
>> That looks fine, with this change squashed in.
>> Ok with you?
>
> Sure! That's perfect, thanks!
Pushed ;-)
Le 22 mai 2012 à 11:42, Jim Meyering a écrit :
> Hi Akim,
Hi!
>
> That looks fine, with this change squashed in.
> Ok with you?
Sure! That's perfect, thanks!
> diff --git a/build-aux/gitlog-to-changelog b/build-aux/gitlog-to-changelog
> index 91dc147..17c4562 100755
> --- a/build-aux/gitlog
On 05/22/2012 06:36 AM, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> It may have worked by accident for now, but POSIX doesn't require it to
>> work, so we are better off using an explicit include that POSIX does
>> guarantee so that if future Interix ever fixes their headers for POSIX
>> compliance, we continue to
Eric Blake writes:
> On 05/22/2012 06:21 AM, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> Bruno Haible writes:
>>
>>> Hi Simon,
>>>
I have reverted the strdup and select patch, and I'll treat
this as a user error.
>>>
>>> It was a user error. But the select.c patch was good: it fixed an
>>> earlier-unde
On 05/22/2012 06:21 AM, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Bruno Haible writes:
>
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>>> I have reverted the strdup and select patch, and I'll treat
>>> this as a user error.
>>
>> It was a user error. But the select.c patch was good: it fixed an
>> earlier-undetected mistake (that would have
Bruno Haible writes:
> Hi Simon,
>
>> I have reverted the strdup and select patch, and I'll treat
>> this as a user error.
>
> It was a user error. But the select.c patch was good: it fixed an
> earlier-undetected mistake (that would have likely been a compilation
> error on Interix).
However In
Hi Simon,
> I have reverted the strdup and select patch, and I'll treat
> this as a user error.
It was a user error. But the select.c patch was good: it fixed an
earlier-undetected mistake (that would have likely been a compilation
error on Interix).
Bruno
Bruno Haible writes:
> Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> It was configured with:
>>
>> CC=c89 CFLAGS="-D_POSIX_SOURCE -I/usr/local/include" ...
>
> Bingo. On many platforms, the _POSIX_SOURCE macro has the effect of
> *hiding* declarations, not of enabling them:
>
> $ uname -srv
> IRIX64 6.5 10060437
>
Simon Josefsson wrote:
> select.c: In function `rpl_select':
> select.c:496: error: `NULL' undeclared (first use in this function)
Thanks for the fix. But that code was meant to be compiled only on
Interix systems, not on IRIX.
> I got this error on a IRIX 6.5 system:
>
> checking for sys/select
Akim Demaille wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> What do you think about the attached proposal? It started here:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2012-05/msg00217.html
>
> Le 15 mai 2012 à 10:02, Akim Demaille a écrit :
>
>>
>> Le 14 mai 2012 à 17:19, Akim Demaille a écrit :
>>
>>> <0001-gitlog-t
Simon Josefsson wrote:
> It was configured with:
>
> CC=c89 CFLAGS="-D_POSIX_SOURCE -I/usr/local/include" ...
Bingo. On many platforms, the _POSIX_SOURCE macro has the effect of
*hiding* declarations, not of enabling them:
$ uname -srv
IRIX64 6.5 10060437
$ cat foo.c
#include
$ cc -E foo.c | g
15 matches
Mail list logo