Re: Is IRIX 6.5 obsolete?

2012-05-22 Thread Bruno Haible
Simon Josefsson wrote: > It was configured with: > > CC=c89 CFLAGS="-D_POSIX_SOURCE -I/usr/local/include" ... Bingo. On many platforms, the _POSIX_SOURCE macro has the effect of *hiding* declarations, not of enabling them: $ uname -srv IRIX64 6.5 10060437 $ cat foo.c #include $ cc -E foo.c | g

Re: [PATCH] gitlog-to-changelog: support the log message format used in Bison

2012-05-22 Thread Jim Meyering
Akim Demaille wrote: > Hi Jim, > > What do you think about the attached proposal? It started here: > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2012-05/msg00217.html > > Le 15 mai 2012 à 10:02, Akim Demaille a écrit : > >> >> Le 14 mai 2012 à 17:19, Akim Demaille a écrit : >> >>> <0001-gitlog-t

Re: select.c:496: error: `NULL' undeclared

2012-05-22 Thread Bruno Haible
Simon Josefsson wrote: > select.c: In function `rpl_select': > select.c:496: error: `NULL' undeclared (first use in this function) Thanks for the fix. But that code was meant to be compiled only on Interix systems, not on IRIX. > I got this error on a IRIX 6.5 system: > > checking for sys/select

Re: Is IRIX 6.5 obsolete?

2012-05-22 Thread Simon Josefsson
Bruno Haible writes: > Simon Josefsson wrote: >> It was configured with: >> >> CC=c89 CFLAGS="-D_POSIX_SOURCE -I/usr/local/include" ... > > Bingo. On many platforms, the _POSIX_SOURCE macro has the effect of > *hiding* declarations, not of enabling them: > > $ uname -srv > IRIX64 6.5 10060437 >

Re: Is IRIX 6.5 obsolete?

2012-05-22 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi Simon, > I have reverted the strdup and select patch, and I'll treat > this as a user error. It was a user error. But the select.c patch was good: it fixed an earlier-undetected mistake (that would have likely been a compilation error on Interix). Bruno

Re: Is IRIX 6.5 obsolete?

2012-05-22 Thread Simon Josefsson
Bruno Haible writes: > Hi Simon, > >> I have reverted the strdup and select patch, and I'll treat >> this as a user error. > > It was a user error. But the select.c patch was good: it fixed an > earlier-undetected mistake (that would have likely been a compilation > error on Interix). However In

Re: Is IRIX 6.5 obsolete?

2012-05-22 Thread Eric Blake
On 05/22/2012 06:21 AM, Simon Josefsson wrote: > Bruno Haible writes: > >> Hi Simon, >> >>> I have reverted the strdup and select patch, and I'll treat >>> this as a user error. >> >> It was a user error. But the select.c patch was good: it fixed an >> earlier-undetected mistake (that would have

Re: Is IRIX 6.5 obsolete?

2012-05-22 Thread Simon Josefsson
Eric Blake writes: > On 05/22/2012 06:21 AM, Simon Josefsson wrote: >> Bruno Haible writes: >> >>> Hi Simon, >>> I have reverted the strdup and select patch, and I'll treat this as a user error. >>> >>> It was a user error. But the select.c patch was good: it fixed an >>> earlier-unde

Re: Is IRIX 6.5 obsolete?

2012-05-22 Thread Eric Blake
On 05/22/2012 06:36 AM, Simon Josefsson wrote: >> It may have worked by accident for now, but POSIX doesn't require it to >> work, so we are better off using an explicit include that POSIX does >> guarantee so that if future Interix ever fixes their headers for POSIX >> compliance, we continue to

Re: [PATCH] gitlog-to-changelog: support the log message format used in Bison

2012-05-22 Thread Akim Demaille
Le 22 mai 2012 à 11:42, Jim Meyering a écrit : > Hi Akim, Hi! > > That looks fine, with this change squashed in. > Ok with you? Sure! That's perfect, thanks! > diff --git a/build-aux/gitlog-to-changelog b/build-aux/gitlog-to-changelog > index 91dc147..17c4562 100755 > --- a/build-aux/gitlog

Re: [PATCH] gitlog-to-changelog: support the log message format used in Bison

2012-05-22 Thread Jim Meyering
Akim Demaille wrote: > Le 22 mai 2012 à 11:42, Jim Meyering a écrit : > >> Hi Akim, > > Hi! > >> >> That looks fine, with this change squashed in. >> Ok with you? > > Sure! That's perfect, thanks! Pushed ;-)

test-system-quote-child.c build error on CentOS 5

2012-05-22 Thread Tom G. Christensen
Hello, Since May 9 my gnulib daily build running on CentOS 5 has failed to complete like this: gcc -std=gnu99 -g -O2 -Wall -o test-system-quote-child test-system-quote-child.o -lm -lm -lm -lm -lm -lm -lm -lm -lm -lm -lm test-system-quote-child.o: In function `main': /home/tgc/projects/gn

Re: Is IRIX 6.5 obsolete?

2012-05-22 Thread Paul Eggert
On 05/22/2012 05:45 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > I wonder if the 'extensions' module should add a -U_POSIX_SOURCE to > CFLAGS on platforms where defining _POSIX_SOURCE is known to disable > useful extensions. Typically it's not a good idea to second-guess users if they explicitly put something into CFL

Re: Is IRIX 6.5 obsolete?

2012-05-22 Thread Simon Josefsson
Paul Eggert writes: > On 05/22/2012 05:45 AM, Eric Blake wrote: >> I wonder if the 'extensions' module should add a -U_POSIX_SOURCE to >> CFLAGS on platforms where defining _POSIX_SOURCE is known to disable >> useful extensions. > > Typically it's not a good idea to second-guess users if they exp

Re: Problem with int types persists on nettle 2.4 and gnutls 3.0.19 on Solaris 9 Sparc

2012-05-22 Thread Dagobert Michelsen
Hi, Am 08.05.2012 um 23:17 schrieb Paul Eggert: > On 05/08/2012 01:05 PM, Niels Möller wrote: >> I think it should work fine to just get the gnutls release and apply >> Paul's patch to the file gnutls-3.0.9/gl/stdint.in.h before running the >> configure script. > > Yes, that's the idea. Thanks.