Jim Meyering wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>
>> Jim Meyering wrote:
>>
>>> Paul Eggert wrote:
On 08/05/2012 06:27 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> * configure.ac: Disable -Wmissing-declarations to avoid warnings
> from gnulib's newly extern-inline functions.
This shouldn't be n
Jim Meyering wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>
>> Paul Eggert wrote:
>>> On 08/05/2012 06:27 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>>>
* configure.ac: Disable -Wmissing-declarations to avoid warnings
from gnulib's newly extern-inline functions.
>>>
>>> This shouldn't be needed if your compiler is suffici
Jim Meyering wrote:
> Paul Eggert wrote:
>> On 08/05/2012 06:27 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>>
>>> * configure.ac: Disable -Wmissing-declarations to avoid warnings
>>> from gnulib's newly extern-inline functions.
>>
>> This shouldn't be needed if your compiler is sufficiently
>> new, because timespec.
Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 08/05/2012 06:27 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>
>> * configure.ac: Disable -Wmissing-declarations to avoid warnings
>> from gnulib's newly extern-inline functions.
>
> This shouldn't be needed if your compiler is sufficiently
> new, because timespec.h's _GL_INLINE_HEADER_BEGIN
>
On 08/05/2012 06:27 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> * configure.ac: Disable -Wmissing-declarations to avoid warnings
> from gnulib's newly extern-inline functions.
This shouldn't be needed if your compiler is sufficiently
new, because timespec.h's _GL_INLINE_HEADER_BEGIN
is supposed to suppress those w
With the latest from gnulib, I get things like this expanded from
timespec.h, and they trigger many -Wmissing-declarations warnings
in coreutils:
#define _GL_TIMESPEC_INLINE _GL_INLINE
# 57 "timespec.h"
inline int
timespec_cmp (struct timespec a, struct timespec b)
{
retu
Eric Blake wrote:
> Libvirt accidentally had an 'exit (-1)' which got by the syntax
> checker; generally, exiting with 255 is not a wise idea.
>
> * top/maint.mk (sc_prohibit_magic_number_exit): Detect negatives.
...
> diff --git a/top/maint.mk b/top/maint.mk
> index d5af750..b39e9ae 100644
> --- a
