Re: [bug-recutils] Doc patch

2012-08-24 Thread Paul Eggert
On 08/24/2012 04:01 PM, Karl Berry wrote: > Works for me. OK, thanks, I did that, as follows: >From 9b2909eba546aaa51e52596654bb20d6378b3dff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Eggert Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 16:42:56 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] doc: remove fdl-1.2.texi It is no longer used or maintai

Re: [bug-recutils] Doc patch

2012-08-24 Thread Karl Berry
of anybody who's using fdl-1.2.texi. Perhaps we should remove it from gnulib, if it's not useful there? Works for me. Any project that misses it needs to update to fdl-1.3 anyway. k

Re: [bug-recutils] Doc patch

2012-08-24 Thread Paul Eggert
On 08/24/2012 03:33 PM, Karl Berry wrote: > The other file is fdl-1.2.texi; can that be fixed too? > > It really seems pointless to me to change an old version of a license > for such a cosmetic matter. I am loath to do so. Sure, that's fine. Come to think of it, I don't know of anybody who

Re: [bug-recutils] Doc patch

2012-08-24 Thread Karl Berry
One is maintain.texi. Karl, can you please apply the following patch? Will do. The other file is fdl-1.2.texi; can that be fixed too? It really seems pointless to me to change an old version of a license for such a cosmetic matter. I am loath to do so. k

Re: [PATCH] execinfo: new module

2012-08-24 Thread Paul Eggert
On 08/24/2012 06:47 AM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > Not until next week. In the mean time could you document that we may need > libexecinfo. That is documented in the modules/execinfo file, under "Link:". Unless you're asking for some further documentation somewhere? If so, can you please show an

Re: [PATCH] execinfo: new module

2012-08-24 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Le 24 août 2012 12:36, "Paul Eggert" a écrit : > > On 08/22/2012 05:16 AM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > > Note that under bsd it will need -lexecinfo see > > http://trac.wxwidgets.org/ticket/9783 > > Thanks for mentioning that. I pushed the following patch, > though I don't have easy access to a ho

Re: [bug-recutils] Doc patch

2012-08-24 Thread Jose E. Marchesi
> 2. Since since that file comes from gnulib, we should recommend they do the same upstream. I did that just now, here: http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=gnulib.git;a=commitdiff;h=0815bd3d34b072659e4e2c8c97241fe2ccae1cd6 Thank you. I updated the gnulib in recutils, an

Re: [PATCH] execinfo: new module

2012-08-24 Thread Paul Eggert
On 08/22/2012 05:09 AM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > Dear paul see http://code.google.com/p/google-breakpad/ for something > that could the work under windows/darwin > see doc here > http://code.google.com/p/google-breakpad/wiki/GettingStartedWithBreakpad Thanks for mentioning that. For Windows, t

Re: [PATCH] execinfo: new module

2012-08-24 Thread Paul Eggert
On 08/22/2012 05:16 AM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > Note that under bsd it will need -lexecinfo see > http://trac.wxwidgets.org/ticket/9783 Thanks for mentioning that. I pushed the following patch, though I don't have easy access to a host that needs this. If you do, can you please try "./gnulib-t

lib-ld.m4 duplicates libtool.m4's --with-gnu-ld

2012-08-24 Thread Simon Josefsson
I noticed this problem that was reported to gnutls some time ago. It seems lib-ld.m4 contains a copy of some code from libtool.m4 from libtool version 1.4. Is there any reason for this? Could lib-ld.m4 assume more modern libtool.m4 instead? /Simon Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos writes: > On 03/10/2

Re: missing documentation for md5 and friends

2012-08-24 Thread Simon Josefsson
Werner LEMBERG writes: > It seems that the crypto stuff is completely undocumented; it would be > great if at least documentation templates are added for all the > functions and modules of gnulib. I agree. I think thre should be a separate section in the manual on crypto-related stuff, and give

missing documentation for md5 and friends

2012-08-24 Thread Werner LEMBERG
It seems that the crypto stuff is completely undocumented; it would be great if at least documentation templates are added for all the functions and modules of gnulib. Werner

Re: [bug-recutils] Doc patch

2012-08-24 Thread Paul Eggert
On 08/23/2012 11:53 PM, John Darrington wrote: > 2. Since since that file comes from gnulib, we should recommend they do the > same upstream. I did that just now, here: http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=gnulib.git;a=commitdiff;h=0815bd3d34b072659e4e2c8c97241fe2ccae1cd6 Two gnulib files sti