Hi,
On Fri, Aug 04, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Thanks for doing all that work. I looked into it, and found a problem: a
> command like "who /var/log/wtmp" stops working because the systemd
> emulation of read_utmp only supports plain "who" (rougnly equivalent to
> "who /var/run/utmp" on Fedora). S
Thanks for doing all that work. I looked into it, and found a problem: a
command like "who /var/log/wtmp" stops working because the systemd
emulation of read_utmp only supports plain "who" (rougnly equivalent to
"who /var/run/utmp" on Fedora). So I installed it into coreutils, but
the default i
Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> My personal opinion is, there's nothing to fix.
>
> That is exactly how macros are supposed to work. Anything undefined
> evaluates to 0. It has been that way since the early days of C and
> C++.
>
> If there's a fix, then it is that you don't use -Wundef.
On the simple l
On Thu, Aug 3, 2023 at 11:52 AM Tim Rühsen wrote:
>
> I just updated gnulib and recognized these warnings with every '#include
> '. Before the update there were no warnings.
>
> ../config.h:3317:34: warning: "__cplusplus" is not defined, evaluates to
> 0 [-Wundef]
> [...]
> Disabling -Wundef for t
Awesome, thank you Bruno !
Tested and your patch fixes the issue(s) for me.
Tim
On 8/3/23 18:11, Bruno Haible wrote:
On Donnerstag, 3. August 2023 17:52:29 CEST Tim Rühsen wrote:
Hi,
I just updated gnulib and recognized these warnings with every '#include
'. Before the update there were no w
On Donnerstag, 3. August 2023 17:52:29 CEST Tim Rühsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just updated gnulib and recognized these warnings with every '#include
> '. Before the update there were no warnings.
>
> ../config.h:3317:34: warning: "__cplusplus" is not defined, evaluates to
> 0 [-Wundef]
> 3317 | #
Hi,
I just updated gnulib and recognized these warnings with every '#include
'. Before the update there were no warnings.
../config.h:3317:34: warning: "__cplusplus" is not defined, evaluates to
0 [-Wundef]
3317 | #if !defined HAVE_C_ALIGNASOF && __cplusplus < 201103 &&
!defined alignof
The configure test shows that Solaris OpenIndiana and Solaris OmniOS don't have
a better fnmatch() implementation than FreeBSD.
2023-08-03 Bruno Haible
doc: More platform detail.
* doc/posix-functions/fnmatch.texi: Mention Solaris OpenIndiana here,
since it behaves dif
For keeping track of open FreeBSD bugs:
2023-08-03 Bruno Haible
doc: Add references to FreeBSD bugs.
* doc/posix-functions/fnmatch.texi: Add commented reference to FreeBSD
bug.
* doc/posix-functions/wcscmp.texi: Likewise.
* doc/posix-functions/wcsncmp.t
