> Hannes Domani wrote:
>> When I'm trying to (statically) link libpoke into gdb, I get the following
>> errors:
>>
>> ... gl-libpoke/xmalloc.c:44: multiple definition of `xmalloc'; alloc.o
>> ... gdb/alloc.c:49: first defined here
>>
>> Both gdb and gl-libpoke define these x* allocation
> Jose E. Marchesi wrote:
>> > But what I wanted to know is: Now that we know that this patch will cause
>> > work to (and may annoy) some people, should I commit it in your name?
>>
>> Please.
>
> OK, I pushed it, adding a summary line to the ChangeLog e
> José E. Marchesi wrote:
>> > Is this your intention?
>>
>> Yes, if the corresponding requirements of the GCS are still considered
>> reasonable and pertinent.
>>
>> Otherwise, I would say we should update the standard in order to turn
>> these requirements into suggestions.
>
> That's a
> Hi José,
>
>> +sc_readme_link_install:
>> +@require='INSTALL' \
>> +in_vc_files='$(top_srcdir)/README$$'\
>> +halt='The README file should refer to INSTALL' \
>> + $(_sc_search_regexp)
>
> This rule will whine
+1,8 @@
+2023-06-05 Jose E. Marchesi
+
+ * top/maint.mk (sc_readme_link_install): New rule.
+ (sc_readme_link_copying): Likewise.
+
2023-06-05 Bruno Haible
posix_spawn-internal: Fix a warning (regression 2022-11-20).
diff --git a/top/maint.mk b/top/maint.mk
index
> Weimin Pan wrote:
>> and will withdraw the request of making Sframe part of Gnulib.
>
> OK.
>
> Just curious: How will you now offer the code to the applications
> that want to incluse it? Through a shared library? Through a static
> library? Through some source-code copy instructions?
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 8:24 PM Bruno Haible wrote:
>>
>> Weimin Pan wrote:
>> > We came to design the SFrame format (The S stands for `simple') due to some
>> > concrete requirements of a very big program that ships its own "online"
>> > stack tracer and unwinder to handle error conditions:
Hi Bruno.
> Since this is a significant contribution (regardless whether it finally
> goes into Gnulib [2] or into Binutils [3]), we will need a copyright
> assignment
> to the FSF for this code. Are you already aware how this works, in your
> context
> as an Oracle employee? Maybe José
Hi people!
The -Wimplicit-fallthrough switch was introduced in GCC 7.
Older version of GCC (like 3 and 4) do not complain when they get passed
an invalid -WFOO option, but GCC 6 bails out like this:
gcc: error: unrecognized command line option '-Wimplicit-fallthrough';
did you mean
> Thanks, I installed that in your name.
Thank you.
This patch adds a couple of hooks to the `bootstrap' script that
allows the users to handle their own command line options in their
bootstrap.conf files.
Usage example:
bootstrap_option_hook ()
{
case $1 in
--jitter-srcdir)
JITTER_SRCDIR=${$1#--jitter-srcdir=}; return 0;;
esac
> +If you, by mistake, use @code{LIB<@var{NAME}>} instead of
> +@code{LTLIB<@var{NAME}>} when linking with libtool, you will observe
that the
> +binaries created in the build dir will prefer the shared libraries
in the
> +installation directories over the
diff --git a/doc/havelib.texi b/doc/havelib.texi
index a776d52..59126c7 100644
--- a/doc/havelib.texi
+++ b/doc/havelib.texi
@@ -79,6 +79,17 @@ when linking with libtool. Both
@code{LTLIB<@var{NAME}>} and
@samp{-Wl,-rpath}, @code{LTLIB<@var{NAME}>} contains platform
diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index ec8db1843..60c3e3aaf 100644
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2020-05-01 Jose E. Marchesi
+
+ Update users.txt.
+ * users.txt: Add poke.
+
2020-04-28 Bruno Haible
posix_spawn_file_actions_addfchdir tests
> > If you want the combination of (B) and (III):
>
> Well, I was going for B.II, but now that you teased me with B.III, I can't
> wait for it!
You find the first alpha version of the GNU libtextstyle library in
, and now the recutils.texi manual is
completely free of @acronym{} marks.
--
Jose E. Marchesi http://www.jemarch.net
GNU Project http://www.gnu.org
in the future.
So here's a module that will guarantee the availability of random() and
associated functions.
Great, thank you! :)
--
Jose E. Marchesi http://www.jemarch.net
GNU Project http://www.gnu.org
cents.
--
Jose E. Marchesijema...@gnu.org
GNU Project http://www.gnu.org
, url_string, url_file_name
and are_urls_equal. We would then contribute additional functions like
url_from_file.
I would be using the module for recutils as well.
--
Jose E. Marchesijema...@gnu.org
GNU Project http://www.gnu.org
, for
example.
The code in url.[ch] seems to be quite independent from the rest of the
codebase.
--
Jose E. Marchesijema...@gnu.org
GNU Project http://www.gnu.org
POSIX BREs and EREs
And the GNU extensions that we should all be supporting by default
:).
Just to be sure. By importing the 'regex' gnulib module and including
REG_EXTENDED in the cflags parameter of regcomp we can be sure that we
are supporting the GNU extensions,
On 01/23/2011 05:27 PM, Karl Berry wrote:
As an available-now alternative, James (Youngman) developed some
automatically-generated Texinfo for each syntax for findutils. I'd
suggest going that way for recutils. I don't remember why we never
generated/imported/exported
Just adding a note that recutils now uses a number of gnulib modules
(see
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=recutils.git;a=blob;f=m4/gnulib-cache.m4):
Great! :D
gl_set_search O(n) O(1)
Here the search method returns a void *, with value (void*)-1
denoting not found. Hmm, or should the search method better
take a 'bool *' argument???
If 'gl_set_search' is merely testing
An unordered set is effectively a mapping between a key and a boolean
(membership) so I am not sure what would be the benefit of returning
something like 'gl_set_node_t' instead of the boolean directly. In
case we want to change the membership status for some key then we
gl_set_search O(n) O(1)
Here the search method returns a void *, with value (void*)-1
denoting not found. Hmm, or should the search method better
take a 'bool *' argument???
If 'gl_set_search' is merely testing the membership of an element in a
set,
Hi Jim.
Jose, here are your two patches, with updated log messages,
followed by 6 more patches, some clean-up, some fixes, that I
tested yesterday or Monday -- I think it was with grep and
coreutils. I'll test again today or tomorrow, then squash each of
the 6 into
It may also be a factor of tabs vs. spaces. Since3 you used tabs,
but the diff indents your line by one space, then lines that had a
single-width leading tab after the last non-whitespace all the
sudden appear off by 7, compared to all leading multi-width tabs
which merely
This looks pretty clear cut.
I'll push this along with the others once I've tested.
This one is fine, and independent, so I've pushed it.
The only tweak I recall was to the one-line summary:
maint.mk: s/_header_without_use/_sc_header_without_use/
(and
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Macro _header_without_use renamed to
_sc_header_without_use in maint.mk
Thanks, Jose.
This looks pretty clear cut.
I'll push this along with the others once I've tested.
Thanks :)
From 94828fa78a7a03dad4cbbd88f3b5f4f9ccf22776 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jose E. Marchesi jema...@gnu.org
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 13:28:34 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Macro _header_without_use renamed to
_sc_header_without_use in maint.mk
---
ChangeLog| 27
From baf55461a6b01978ba02327f790f4fd544b1342f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jose E. Marchesi jema...@gnu.org
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 13:35:24 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] Catch function calls with zero or more blank characters
before the argument list in syntax check rules.
---
ChangeLog
From 24ab183f237468f2aa59d2424dc416f61c183671 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jose E. Marchesi jema...@gnu.org
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 15:42:03 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] Macro _prohibit_regexp replaced by _sc_search_regep and
rules adapted to use the new macro.
---
ChangeLog| 40
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 09:39:06 Sam Steingold wrote:
Bruno Haible wrote:
If gnulib-tool was to be rewritten in another programming language
than
shell + sed, what would be the good choices?
a popularity contest is not the way to choose a language.
and why aren't you even
Hi.
It seems automake 1.9 doesnt call aclocal anymore (automake devs think
that autoreconf is a better place where doing such things).
As a consequence, ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS seems to be ignored by automake. The
-I m4 argument should be passed to aclocal in the bootstrap chain.
Would be nice to have
35 matches
Mail list logo
