[PATCH] Further improve cross-compilation guesses for midipix

2024-02-02 Thread Ørjan Malde
from running the testsuite: PASS: test-nanosleep PASS: test-ftruncate.sh PASS: test-utime PASS: test-utimens PASS: test-utimensat PASS: test-rename hopefully this time my contribution is less noisy. :-) Regards, Ørjan >From 3feffaa8b70de4b8bf1491006a871bda63ca31f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From:

Re: [PATCH] Further improve cross-compilation guesses for midipix

2024-02-05 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi, Ørjan Malde wrote: > from running the testsuite: > PASS: test-nanosleep > PASS: test-ftruncate.sh > PASS: test-utime > PASS: test-utimens > PASS: test-utimensat > PASS: test-rename OK... > @@ -119,6 +119,9 @@ AC_DEFUN([gl_FUNC_NANOSLEEP], > # Guess it halfway works when the kern

Re: [PATCH] Further improve cross-compilation guesses for midipix

2024-02-06 Thread Ørjan Malde
On Tuesday, February 6th, 2024 at 12:47 AM, Bruno Haible wrote: > Hi, > > Ørjan Malde wrote: > > > from running the testsuite: > > PASS: test-nanosleep > > PASS: test-ftruncate.sh > > PASS: test-utime > > PASS: test-utimens > > PASS: test-utimensat > > PASS: test-rename > > > OK... > > > @@

Re: [PATCH] Further improve cross-compilation guesses for midipix

2024-02-06 Thread Bruno Haible
Ørjan Malde wrote: > > If on Linux, the result is 'guessing no (mishandles large arguments)', > > it should be the same on systems that emulate the Linux system calls. Right? > > > > No, we have handled the mishandling of large arguments and nanosleep passes > all of gnulib's tests unlike linux.