Re: [PATCH] gnulib-tool.py: Follow gnulib-tool changes, part 52.

2024-03-11 Thread Collin Funk
On 3/11/24 4:57 AM, Bruno Haible wrote: > This looks good to me. 'sed' accepts POSIX BREs, where '(' and '[' stand for > the literal '(' and '[' characters unless escaped. Thanks for double checking for me. > Also, I applied the attached follow-up, in order to make the logic of the code > easier

Re: [PATCH] gnulib-tool.py: Follow gnulib-tool changes, part 52.

2024-03-11 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi Collin, > On 3/10/24 5:13 AM, Bruno Haible wrote: > > automake_options = {x for y in configure_ac_automake_options for x in > > y.split()} > > I've attached the fixed patch. Thanks, applied. > I would like to double check the regular expression I used: > > pattern =

Re: [PATCH] gnulib-tool.py: Follow gnulib-tool changes, part 52.

2024-03-10 Thread Collin Funk
Hi Bruno, On 3/10/24 5:13 AM, Bruno Haible wrote: > automake_options = {x for y in configure_ac_automake_options for x in > y.split()} I've attached the fixed patch. The only change is turning this line to: automake_options = { x for y in

Re: [PATCH] gnulib-tool.py: Follow gnulib-tool changes, part 52.

2024-03-10 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi Collin, This one looks good, except please reformat the line automake_options = {x for y in configure_ac_automake_options for x in y.split()} as suggested for part 51. Bruno

[PATCH] gnulib-tool.py: Follow gnulib-tool changes, part 52.

2024-03-09 Thread Collin Funk
On 3/9/24 6:28 PM, Collin Funk wrote: > I think that should be a pretty easy change so I will try to get it > done sometime today. Not the cleanest code I have ever written but it seems to work. :) Here is a test case: gnulib-tool.py --create-testdir --dir test-python dummy gnulib-tool