Re: [PATCH] gnulib-tool.py: Follow gnulib-tool changes, part 64.

2024-03-18 Thread Collin Funk
Hi Bruno, On 3/18/24 4:05 AM, Bruno Haible wrote: > Thanks a lot. Yes, things get tricky if, after after some refactoring, the > function names don't fit the semantics any more. Yeah, how we have it now should match gnulib-tool.sh, but the naming is a bit misleading. I'll keep it in the back of

Re: [PATCH] gnulib-tool.py: Follow gnulib-tool changes, part 64.

2024-03-18 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi Collin, > after the change that this patch is following the function names are > slightly misleading since: > > GLModule.isNonTests() != (not GLModule.isTests()) > > Instead we have 3 separate unique operations in gnulib-tool.sh: > > 1. func_verify_tests_module > 2.

[PATCH] gnulib-tool.py: Follow gnulib-tool changes, part 64.

2024-03-17 Thread Collin Funk
01 From: Collin Funk Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 20:09:12 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] gnulib-tool.py: Follow gnulib-tool changes, part 64. Follow gnulib-tool change 2021-12-25 Bruno Haible gnulib-tool: Respect applicability 'all' without --single-configure. * pygnulib/GLModuleSystem.py (GLModule.isT