Jim Meyering wrote:
> Peter O'Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Eric Blake wrote:
>>> According to Jim Meyering on 9/16/2008 3:58 AM:
Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I discovered that Solaris 11's /bin/sh exhibits the following
> surprising behavior:
>
> $ /
Peter O'Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eric Blake wrote:
>> According to Jim Meyering on 9/16/2008 3:58 AM:
>>> Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I discovered that Solaris 11's /bin/sh exhibits the following
surprising behavior:
$ /bin/sh -c 'umask 22; (umask 0);
Eric Blake wrote:
> According to Jim Meyering on 9/16/2008 3:58 AM:
>> Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I discovered that Solaris 11's /bin/sh exhibits the following
>>> surprising behavior:
>>>
>>> $ /bin/sh -c 'umask 22; (umask 0); umask'
>>>
>
> We should also document t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Jim Meyering on 9/16/2008 3:58 AM:
> Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I discovered that Solaris 11's /bin/sh exhibits the following
>> surprising behavior:
>>
>> $ /bin/sh -c 'umask 22; (umask 0); umask'
>>
We shoul
Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I discovered that Solaris 11's /bin/sh exhibits the following
> surprising behavior:
>
> $ /bin/sh -c 'umask 22; (umask 0); umask'
>
>
> That would cause test failures in coreutils, because gl_POSIX_SHELL
> accepted /bin/sh. The following chan
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I discovered that Solaris 11's /bin/sh ...
>
> What is Solaris 11? Do you have any references? Neither Wikipedia [1] nor
> the Sun documentation [2] mention such a release.
Hi Bruno,
Opensolaris calls itself SunOS 5.11.
Hi Jim,
> I discovered that Solaris 11's /bin/sh ...
What is Solaris 11? Do you have any references? Neither Wikipedia [1] nor
the Sun documentation [2] mention such a release.
Bruno
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solaris_(operating_system)
[2] http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/prod/solaris
Hi Paul,
I discovered that Solaris 11's /bin/sh exhibits the following
surprising behavior:
$ /bin/sh -c 'umask 22; (umask 0); umask'
That would cause test failures in coreutils, because gl_POSIX_SHELL
accepted /bin/sh. The following change is enough to make
gl_POSIX_SHELL reject t
