Eric,
* doc/posix-functions/posix_openpt.texi: Mention ENOENT error code.
Which platforms failed with ENOENT?
On those platforms that don't have posix_openpt() already, except AIX
and native Windows, you attempt to open /dev/ptmx. If it does not exist,
the function fails with ENOENT.
Jim Meyering wrote:
diff --git a/lib/posix_openpt.c b/lib/posix_openpt.c
index 3b7d4cf..19cd0b6 100644
--- a/lib/posix_openpt.c
+++ b/lib/posix_openpt.c
@@ -46,5 +46,3 @@ posix_openpt (int flags)
return master;
}
-
-#endif
Another pretty basic failure, that makes me think I'm the
Eric Blake wrote:
+2011-10-17 Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com
+
+ posix_openpt: new module
+ * modules/posix_openpt: New module.
+ * m4/posix_openpt.m4: New file.
+ * lib/posix_openpt.c: Likewise.
+ * m4/stdlib_h.m4 (gl_STDLIB_H): Check for decl.
+
Hi Eric,
This module fails to build on several platforms.
On AIX 5.1:
test-posix_openpt.c:24: error: 'posix_openpt' undeclared here (not in a
function)
test-posix_openpt.c: In function 'main':
test-posix_openpt.c:45: warning: implicit declaration of function 'posix_openpt'
make: 1254-004 The
On 10/19/2011 03:50 AM, Bruno Haible wrote:
Hi Eric,
This module fails to build on several platforms.
On AIX 5.1:
test-posix_openpt.c:24: error: 'posix_openpt' undeclared here (not in a
function)
Thanks for fixing that.
2011-10-19 Bruno Haiblebr...@clisp.org
posix_openpt: Fix
I ran gnulib's top-level make check, and cppi spotted this:
From ca3be51f7beb529726b066d1da34acd338828b24 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Meyering meyer...@redhat.com
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:28:46 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] posix_openpt: remove spurious #endif
* lib/posix_openpt.c
* modules/posix_openpt: New module.
* m4/posix_openpt.m4: New file.
* lib/posix_openpt.c: Likewise.
* m4/stdlib_h.m4 (gl_STDLIB_H): Check for decl.
(gl_STDLIB_H_DEFAULTS): Set defaults.
* modules/stdlib (Makefile.am): Substitute macros.
* lib/stdlib.in.h (posix_openpt): Declare.
* MODULES.html.sh
