Daiki Ueno writes:
> Paul Eggert writes:
>
>> On 10/23/2014 04:43 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>>> Except for the assert() nit, I can't find any issues.
>>
>> My only nit was adding the "#if 0"; might as well just delete the code
>> instead. I only read the code; I didn't test it.
>
> Thanks. Will
Paul Eggert writes:
> On 10/23/2014 04:43 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>> Except for the assert() nit, I can't find any issues.
>
> My only nit was adding the "#if 0"; might as well just delete the code
> instead. I only read the code; I didn't test it.
Thanks. Will fix those in the next update.
On 10/23/2014 04:43 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
Except for the assert() nit, I can't find any issues.
My only nit was adding the "#if 0"; might as well just delete the code
instead. I only read the code; I didn't test it.
On 10/23/2014 09:01 AM, Daiki Ueno wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is an update of the patches I posted on bug-libunistring two weeks ago:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libunistring/2014-10/msg1.html
>
> Changes from v1:
> - The line-breaking implementation has been updated for LBP_HL and
Hello,
This is an update of the patches I posted on bug-libunistring two weeks ago:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libunistring/2014-10/msg1.html
Changes from v1:
- The line-breaking implementation has been updated for LBP_HL and LBP_RI
- The changes to gen-uninames.lisp is included
-
