Hello,
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 08:23:29PM +0200, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Stepan Kasal wrote:
> > I noticed two problems with stdbool.m4:
> >
> > Even with Autoconf-2.59, this file is included in aclocal.m4,
> > and thus the gnulib definition overrides the Autoconf one.
>
> This is what we want. Loo
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Paul Eggert wrote:
>> > 1) now, the appended patch,
>> > 2) in a year, change modules/stdbool to require gl_STDBOOL_H,
>>
>> Sounds good, except why wait for a year between (1) and (2)?
>> I don't see the downside of doing (2) now.
>
> People who upda
Paul Eggert wrote:
> > 1) now, the appended patch,
> > 2) in a year, change modules/stdbool to require gl_STDBOOL_H,
>
> Sounds good, except why wait for a year between (1) and (2)?
> I don't see the downside of doing (2) now.
People who update from gnulib in a manual, not always synchronized
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> To provide for a smooth transition from AM_STDBOOL_H to gl_STDBOOL_H,
> I propose a three-step procedure:
> 1) now, the appended patch,
> 2) in a year, change modules/stdbool to require gl_STDBOOL_H,
> 3) in two years, drop AM_STDBOOL_H.
Sounds goo
Stepan Kasal wrote:
> I noticed two problems with stdbool.m4:
>
> Even with Autoconf-2.59, this file is included in aclocal.m4,
> and thus the gnulib definition overrides the Autoconf one.
This is what we want. Look at the comment:
-
